These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17546462)

  • 21. Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.
    Sellaro R; Treccani B; Job R; Cubelli R
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):950-62. PubMed ID: 25476998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Increases in rewards promote flexible behavior.
    Shen YJ; Chun MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):938-52. PubMed ID: 21264699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?
    Proctor RW; Vu KP; Nicoletti R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1318-29. PubMed ID: 14710965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
    Wühr P; Biebl R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?
    Halvorson KM; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1403-9. PubMed ID: 25754530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning.
    Braem S; Verguts T; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1662-6. PubMed ID: 21728466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Verguts T; Reynvoet B; Caessens B; Fias W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 16478324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.
    Koch I; Allport A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):433-44. PubMed ID: 16752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Congruency effects on the basis of instructed response-effect contingencies.
    Theeuwes M; De Houwer J; Eder A; Liefooghe B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():43-50. PubMed ID: 25939136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli.
    Kunde W; Wühr P
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 14608506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: evidence for reduction of task competition.
    Hübner M; Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 12696816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?
    Ruthruff E; Hazeltine E; Remington RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 16184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):832-42. PubMed ID: 17723063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.