292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17546480)
1. Religious characteristics and the death penalty.
Miller MK; Hayward RD
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 17546480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
Miller MK; Bornstein BH
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
Lynch M; Haney C
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
Antonio ME
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adolescents' attitudes toward the death penalty.
Lester D; Maggioncalda-Aretz M; Stark SH
Adolescence; 1997; 32(126):447-9. PubMed ID: 9179340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Jury panel member perceptions of interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict support for execution in a capital murder trial simulation.
Cox J; Clark JC; Edens JF; Smith ST; Magyar MS
Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(4):411-28. PubMed ID: 23754472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process.
Butler B
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):857-67. PubMed ID: 18046739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An empirical investigation of insanity defense attitudes: exploring factors related to bias.
Bloechl AL; Vitacco MJ; Neumann CS; Erickson SE
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 17166589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
Butler B; Moran G
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 17440900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of crime victimization and fear of crime on attitudes toward death penalty defendants.
Seltzer R; McCormick JP
Violence Vict; 1987; 2(2):99-114. PubMed ID: 3154161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Capital punishment views in China and the United States: a preliminary study among college students.
Jiang S; Lambert EG; Wang J
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):84-97. PubMed ID: 17210658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. God's will, God's punishment, or God's limitations? Religious coping strategies reported by young adults living with serious mental illness.
Phillips RE; Stein CH
J Clin Psychol; 2007 Jun; 63(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 17457851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavioral science and the juvenile death penalty.
Leong GB; Eth S
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 2676026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: the cost of converting religious morals into politics.
Ciccone JR; Clements C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 19092065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials.
Barnett ME; Brodsky SL; Davis CM
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 15386561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
