These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Predicting wife assault: a critical review and implications for policy and practice. Hilton NZ; Harris GT Trauma Violence Abuse; 2005 Jan; 6(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 15574670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Actuarial risk assessment in sexually motivated intimate-partner violence. Rettenberger M; Eher R Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):75-86. PubMed ID: 22545581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How nonrecidivism affects predictive accuracy: evidence from a cross-validation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Hilton NZ; Harris GT J Interpers Violence; 2009 Feb; 24(2):326-37. PubMed ID: 18391055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients. Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Actuarial assessment of violence risk in hospital-based partner assault clinics. Hilton NZ; Harris GT; Holder N Can J Nurs Res; 2008 Dec; 40(4):56-70. PubMed ID: 19186785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of discordance among violence and general recidivism risk estimates on predictive accuracy. Mills JF; Kroner DG Crim Behav Ment Health; 2006; 16(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 16795126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incremental prediction of intimate partner violence: An examination of three risk measures. Olver ME; Jung S Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):440-453. PubMed ID: 28650186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Belfrage H; Strand S; Storey JE; Gibas AL; Kropp PR; Hart SD Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 22471386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Police response to domestic violence: making decisions about risk and risk management. Perez Trujillo M; Ross S J Interpers Violence; 2008 Apr; 23(4):454-73. PubMed ID: 18252942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample. Eisenbarth H; Osterheider M; Nedopil N; Stadtland C Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 22718134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family violence risk assessment: A predictive cross-validation study of the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument-Revised (DVSI-R). Williams KR Law Hum Behav; 2012 Apr; 36(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 22471416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism. Kröner C; Stadtland C; Eidt M; Nedopil N Crim Behav Ment Health; 2007; 17(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17295202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incremental validity analyses of the violence risk appraisal guide and the psychopathy checklist: screening version in a civil psychiatric sample. Edens JF; Skeem JL; Douglas KS Assessment; 2006 Sep; 13(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 16880286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R) within a correctional sample. Glover AJJ; Churcher FP; Gray AL; Mills JF; Nicholson DE Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):507-518. PubMed ID: 28782966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The outcome of court-mandated treatment for wife assault: a quasi-experimental evaluation. Dutton DG Violence Vict; 1986; 1(3):163-75. PubMed ID: 3154147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]