These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17546742)

  • 1. Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17546742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period.
    Brisson B; Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19000734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jolicoeur P; Sessa P; Dell'Acqua R; Robitaille N
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):414-24. PubMed ID: 16184394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: an event-related fMRI study.
    Szameitat AJ; Lepsien J; von Cramon DY; Sterr A; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):541-52. PubMed ID: 16142491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex.
    Marois R; Larson JM; Chun MM; Shima D
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):436-47. PubMed ID: 16283409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes.
    Ivry RB; Franz EA; Kingstone A; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):463-80. PubMed ID: 9554094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention.
    Kehrer S; Kraft A; Irlbacher K; Koch SP; Hagendorf H; Kathmann N; Brandt SA
    Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):751-61. PubMed ID: 19050912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Heinze HJ; Luck SJ; Münte TF; Gös A; Mangun GR; Hillyard SA
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jul; 56(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 8084731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The late Nd reflects a memory trace containing amodal spatial information.
    Meehan S; Singhal A; Fowler B
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Sep; 42(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 16176375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming.
    Mangun GR; Hillyard SA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1057-74. PubMed ID: 1837297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination.
    Sommer W; Leuthold H; Schubert T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11340870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field.
    Corballis PM; Gratton G
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Oct; 64(1-2):191-209. PubMed ID: 14602362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Sensory gating" as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments.
    Eimer M
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jun; 55(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 8058454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual evoked potentials related to behavioral asymmetries during foveal attention in the two extrapersonal hemispaces.
    Tressoldi PE; Cusumano S
    Brain Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 1575972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related brain potentials and attention during simultaneous performance of two tasks.
    Sullivan C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Oct; 83(2):651-7. PubMed ID: 8902045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of reaction time in continuous performance tasks as an index of attention by electrophysiological measures.
    Reinvang I
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Dec; 20(6):885-97. PubMed ID: 10484699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.
    Sawaki R; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1455-70. PubMed ID: 20675793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.