These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17547159)

  • 1. Baseload coal investment decisions under uncertain carbon legislation.
    Bergerson JA; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3431-6. PubMed ID: 17547159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Storing syngas lowers the carbon price for profitable coal gasification.
    Newcomer A; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Dec; 41(23):7974-9. PubMed ID: 18186325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?
    Patiño-Echeverri D; Morel B; Apt J; Chen C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Dec; 41(23):7980-6. PubMed ID: 18186326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pricing tomorrow's coal-fired power plant.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3396-7. PubMed ID: 17547149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.
    Rudokas J; Miller PJ; Trail MA; Russell AG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5170-7. PubMed ID: 25803240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle systems based on Frame 7H versus 7F gas turbines.
    Zhu Y; Frey HC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Dec; 56(12):1649-61. PubMed ID: 17195484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
    Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage.
    Sekar A; Williams E; Chester M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11705-12. PubMed ID: 25187199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-carbon technological innovation of coal production and utilization impetus carbon neutrality in China.
    Wang S; Chen F; Wang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(33):80916-80930. PubMed ID: 37310598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.