These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17547182)

  • 1. Surface complexation modeling of U(VI) sorption to Hanford sediment with varying geochemical conditions.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Krupka KM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3587-92. PubMed ID: 17547182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of calcite and dissolved calcium on uranium(VI) sorption to a hanford subsurface sediment.
    Dong W; Ball WP; Liu C; Wang Z; Stone AT; Bai J; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(20):7949-55. PubMed ID: 16295860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishing a geochemical heterogeneity model for a contaminated vadose zone--aquifer system.
    Murray CJ; Zachara JM; McKinley JP; Ward A; Bott YJ; Draper K; Moore D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():122-40. PubMed ID: 23664489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface complexation modeling of U(VI) adsorption by aquifer sediments from a former mill tailings site at Rifle, Colorado.
    Hyun SP; Fox PM; Davis JA; Campbell KM; Hayes KF; Long PE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9368-73. PubMed ID: 20000531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinetics of uranium(VI) desorption from contaminated sediments: effect of geochemical conditions and model evaluation.
    Liu C; Shi Z; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 43(17):6560-6. PubMed ID: 19764217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advective removal of intraparticle uranium from contaminated vadose zone sediments, Hanford, U.S.
    Ilton ES; Qafoku NP; Liu C; Moore DA; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Mar; 42(5):1565-71. PubMed ID: 18441804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sorption of uranium (VI) on homoionic sodium smectite experimental study and surface complexation modeling.
    Korichi S; Bensmaili A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):780-93. PubMed ID: 19428178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of sorption-retarded U(VI) diffusion in Hanford silt/clay material.
    Bai J; Liu C; Ball WP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(20):7706-11. PubMed ID: 19921882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinetic desorption and sorption of U(VI) during reactive transport in a contaminated Hanford sediment.
    Qafoku NP; Zachara JM; Liu C; Gassman PL; Qafoku OS; Smith SC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May; 39(9):3157-65. PubMed ID: 15926566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of sediment bioreduction and reoxidation on uranium sorption.
    Liu C; Zachara JM; Zhong L; Kukkadupa R; Szecsody JE; Kennedy DW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jun; 39(11):4125-33. PubMed ID: 15984791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U(VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments at the Hanford Site.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Brown CF; Last GV
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):255-69. PubMed ID: 17499879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of sediment properties and solution pH in the adsorption of uranium(VI) to freshwater sediments.
    Crawford SE; Lofts S; Liber K
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Jan; 220(Pt B):873-881. PubMed ID: 27825841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additive surface complexation modeling of uranium(VI) adsorption onto quartz-sand dominated sediments.
    Dong W; Wan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(12):6569-77. PubMed ID: 24865372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for estimating adsorbed uranium(VI) and distribution coefficients of contaminated sediments.
    Kohler M; Curtis GP; Meece DE; Davis JA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jan; 38(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 14740742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatially resolved U(VI) partitioning and speciation: implications for plume scale behavior of contaminant U in the Hanford vadose zone.
    Wan J; Kim Y; Tokunaga TK; Wang Z; Dixit S; Steefel CI; Saiz E; Kunz M; Tamura N
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2247-53. PubMed ID: 19452870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty and variability in laboratory derived sorption parameters of sediments from a uranium in situ recovery site.
    Dangelmayr MA; Reimus PW; Johnson RH; Clay JT; Stone JJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jun; 213():28-39. PubMed ID: 29691066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncertainty analysis of multi-rate kinetics of uranium desorption from sediments.
    Zhang X; Liu C; Hu BX; Zhang G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Jan; 156():1-15. PubMed ID: 24231190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microscale geochemical gradients in Hanford 300 Area sediment biofilms and influence of uranium.
    Nguyen HD; Cao B; Mishra B; Boyanov MI; Kemner KM; Fredrickson JK; Beyenal H
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):227-34. PubMed ID: 22078229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phosphate-Induced Immobilization of Uranium in Hanford Sediments.
    Pan Z; Giammar DE; Mehta V; Troyer LD; Catalano JG; Wang Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(24):13486-13494. PubMed ID: 27993066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Persistence of uranium groundwater plumes: contrasting mechanisms at two DOE sites in the groundwater-river interaction zone.
    Zachara JM; Long PE; Bargar J; Davis JA; Fox P; Fredrickson JK; Freshley MD; Konopka AE; Liu C; McKinley JP; Rockhold ML; Williams KH; Yabusaki SB
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Apr; 147():45-72. PubMed ID: 23500840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.