234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17547231)
1. Field evaluation against mosquitoes of regular and polymer-based deet formulations in Manitoba, Canada, with comment on methodological issues.
Schofield S; Tepper M; Gadawski R
J Med Entomol; 2007 May; 44(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 17547231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory and field evaluation of the impact of exercise on the performance of regular and polymer-based deet repellents.
Schofield S; Tepper M; Gadawski R
J Med Entomol; 2007 Nov; 44(6):1026-31. PubMed ID: 18047202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA
Mbuba E; Odufuwa OG; Tenywa FC; Philipo R; Tambwe MM; Swai JK; Moore JD; Moore SJ
Malar J; 2021 Jan; 20(1):12. PubMed ID: 33407496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Advanced Odomos repellent cream (N, N-diethyl-benzamide) against mosquito vectors.
Mittal PK; Sreehari U; Razdan RK; Dash AP; Ansari MA
Indian J Med Res; 2011 Apr; 133(4):426-30. PubMed ID: 21537097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory and field evaluations of the insect repellent 3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) and deet against mosquito vectors in Thailand.
Thavara U; Tawatsin A; Chompoosri J; Suwonkerd W; Chansang UR; Asavadachanukorn P
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Sep; 17(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 14529087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory and field evaluation of MAÏA
Traoré A; Niyondiko G; Sanou A; Langevin F; Sagnon N; Gansané A; Guelbeogo MW
Malar J; 2021 May; 20(1):226. PubMed ID: 34016099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites.
Fradin MS; Day JF
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jul; 347(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12097535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia.
Frances SP; Van Dung N; Beebe NW; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2002 May; 39(3):541-4. PubMed ID: 12061453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. N,N-diethyl phenylacetamide (DEPA): A safe and effective repellent for personal protection against hematophagous arthropods.
Kalyanasundaram M; Mathew N
J Med Entomol; 2006 May; 43(3):518-25. PubMed ID: 16739410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel arthropod repellent, BioUD, is an efficacious alternative to deet.
Witting-Bissinger BE; Stumpf CF; Donohue KV; Apperson CS; Roe RM
J Med Entomol; 2008 Sep; 45(5):891-8. PubMed ID: 18826032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus.
Cilek JE; Petersen JL; Hallmon CE
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Sep; 20(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15532931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the sensitivity of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to two insect repellents: DEET and KBR 3023.
Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E; Ouédraogo AP; Costantini C
Trop Med Int Health; 2004 Mar; 9(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 14996361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protective efficacy of menthol propylene glycol carbonate compared to N, N-diethyl-methylbenzamide against mosquito bites in Northern Tanzania.
Kweka EJ; Munga S; Mahande AM; Msangi S; Mazigo HD; Adrias AQ; Matias JR
Parasit Vectors; 2012 Sep; 5():189. PubMed ID: 22950604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effectiveness of commercial repellents against Aedes aegypti (L.) in Yucatan, México].
Uc-Puc V; Herrera-Bojórquez J; Carmona-Carballo C; Che-Mendoza A; Medina-Barreiro A; Chablé-Santos J; Arredondo-Jiménez JI; Flores-Suárez AE; Manrique-Saide P
Salud Publica Mex; 2016 Aug; 58(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 27599081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insect repellents and sunscreen: implications for personal protection strategies against mosquito-borne disease.
Webb CE; Russell RC
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 33(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 19811489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New mosquito repellency bioassay for evaluation of repellents and pyrethroids using an attractive blood-feeding device.
Morimoto Y; Kawada H; Kuramoto KY; Mitsuhashi T; Saitoh T; Minakawa N
Parasit Vectors; 2021 Mar; 14(1):151. PubMed ID: 33691776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field evaluation of deet against Anopheles farauti at Ndendo (Santa Cruz) Island, Solomon Islands.
Frances SP; Bugoro H; Butafa C; Cooper RD
J Med Entomol; 2010 Sep; 47(5):851-4. PubMed ID: 20939380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remarkable repellency of Ligusticum sinense (Umbelliferae), a herbal alternative against laboratory populations of Anopheles minimus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).
Sanghong R; Junkum A; Chaithong U; Jitpakdi A; Riyong D; Tuetun B; Champakaew D; Intirach J; Muangmoon R; Chansang A; Pitasawat B
Malar J; 2015 Aug; 14():307. PubMed ID: 26249666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insecticidal, acaricidal and repellent effects of DEET- and IR3535-impregnated bed nets using a novel long-lasting polymer-coating technique.
Faulde MK; Albiez G; Nehring O
Parasitol Res; 2010 Mar; 106(4):957-65. PubMed ID: 20162432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field efficacy of a new repellent, KBR 3023, against Aedes albopictus (SKUSE) and Culex quinquefasciatus (SAY) in a tropical environment.
Yap HH; Jahangir K; Chong AS; Adanan CR; Chong NL; Malik YA; Rohaizat B
J Vector Ecol; 1998 Jun; 23(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9673931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
