These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17548677)

  • 1. Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors.
    McCormack VA; Highnam R; Perry N; dos Santos Silva I
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1148-54. PubMed ID: 17548677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods.
    Aitken Z; McCormack VA; Highnam RP; Martin L; Gunasekara A; Melnichouk O; Mawdsley G; Peressotti C; Yaffe M; Boyd NF; dos Santos Silva I
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Feb; 19(2):418-28. PubMed ID: 20142240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study.
    Ding J; Warren R; Warsi I; Day N; Thompson D; Brady M; Tromans C; Highnam R; Easton D
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 May; 17(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 18483328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form.
    Jeffreys M; Warren R; Highnam R; Smith GD
    Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):378-82. PubMed ID: 16632617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density.
    Shepherd JA; Herve L; Landau J; Fan B; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1490-8. PubMed ID: 16752583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of Computer-Assisted Breast Density Estimation: Comparison of Interactive Thresholding, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Methods.
    Kang E; Lee EJ; Jang M; Kim SM; Kim Y; Chun M; Tai JH; Han W; Kim SW; Kim JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 27187523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Little L; Lockwood G; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Oct; 5(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 8972250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
    Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views.
    van Engeland S; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing measurements of breast density.
    Highnam R; Jeffreys M; McCormack V; Warren R; Davey Smith G; Brady M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5881-95. PubMed ID: 17881806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and clinical validation of a software program for automated measurement of mammographic breast density.
    Araújo ALC; Soares HB; Carvalho DF; Mendonça RM; Oliveira AG
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Mar; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 32122371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of breast arterial calcium mass quantification using digital mammography.
    Molloi S; Mehraien T; Iribarren C; Smith C; Ducote JL; Feig SA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 19201356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women.
    Habel LA; Alexeeff SE; Achacoso N; Arasu VA; Gastounioti A; Gerstley L; Klein RJ; Liang RY; Lipson JA; Mankowski W; Margolies LR; Rothstein JH; Rubin DL; Shen L; Sistig A; Song X; Villaseñor MA; Westley M; Whittemore AS; Yaffe MJ; Wang P; Kontos D; Sieh W
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Aug; 25(1):92. PubMed ID: 37544983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reader variability in breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: the effect of image postprocessing on relative and absolute measures.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Gavenonis SC; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):560-8. PubMed ID: 23465381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.