207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17549653)
1. Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.
Replogle WH; Johnson WD
Fam Med; 2007 Jun; 39(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 17549653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The number remaining at risk: an adjunct to the number needed to treat.
Massel D; Cruickshank MK
Can J Cardiol; 2002 Mar; 18(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 11907613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linking evidence-based medicine therapeutic summary measures to clinical decision analysis.
Djulbegovic B; Hozo I; Lyman GH
MedGenMed; 2000 Jan; 2(1):E6. PubMed ID: 11104452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Using "number needed to treat" to interpret treatment effect].
Ke DS
Acta Neurol Taiwan; 2006 Jun; 15(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 16871900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based dermatology: number needed to treat and its relation to other risk measures.
Manriquez JJ; Villouta MF; Williams HC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Apr; 56(4):664-71. PubMed ID: 17367615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Basic statistics for clinicians: 3. Assessing the effects of treatment: measures of association.
Jaeschke R; Guyatt G; Shannon H; Walter S; Cook D; Heddle N
CMAJ; 1995 Feb; 152(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 7828099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions.
Mayne TJ; Whalen E; Vu A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 16488351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measures of association in clinical trials: definition and interpretation.
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1393-401. PubMed ID: 14768494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Number needed to treat (NNT)-- misleading, misunderstood, misused?].
Wisløff T; Halvorsen PA; Kristiansen IS
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Aug; 124(15):1926-9. PubMed ID: 15306861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative vs. absolute measures of benefit and risk: what's the difference?
Citrome L
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Feb; 121(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19694632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based evaluation of benefits in therapeutic interventions: methodologically controlled and non-randomly assigned reflections on the number needed to treat.
Gensini GF; Conti AA
Ital Heart J; 2003 Feb; 4(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 12762269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Number needed to treat and number needed to harm are not the best way to report and assess the results of randomised clinical trials.
Hutton JL
Br J Haematol; 2009 Jun; 146(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 19438480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The number needed to harm: is it too optimistic?
Massel D
Can J Cardiol; 2003 Dec; 19(13):1490-2. PubMed ID: 14760438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncertainty in the minimum event risk to justify treatment was evaluated.
Walter SD; Sinclair JC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):816-24. PubMed ID: 19216053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.
Berry DC; Knapp P; Raynor T
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16242904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How effective is that treatment? The number needed to treat.
Deahl ST
Tex Dent J; 2011 Feb; 128(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 21473250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding results.
Breau RH; Dahm P; Fergusson DA; Hatala R
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):985-92. PubMed ID: 19150555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Communicating the benefits and harms of treatments.
Akobeng AK
Arch Dis Child; 2008 Aug; 93(8):710-3. PubMed ID: 18456681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Number needed to treat (NNT)--sound or stupid as a basis for decision?].
Svangren P
Lakartidningen; 2007 May 30-Jun 3; 104(22):1690-4. PubMed ID: 17601318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
Jaillon P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
