These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17549752)

  • 1. Optimal designs for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):776-88. PubMed ID: 17549752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Nat Genet; 2006 Feb; 38(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 16415888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal robust two-stage designs for genome-wide association studies.
    Nguyen TT; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 73(Pt 6):638-51. PubMed ID: 19839987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans.
    Wang H; Thomas DC; Pe'er I; Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 16607626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategies for genome-wide association studies: optimization of study designs by the stepwise focusing method.
    Saito A; Kamatani N
    J Hum Genet; 2002; 47(7):360-5. PubMed ID: 12111370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal selection of markers for validation or replication from genome-wide association studies.
    Greenwood CM; Rangrej J; Sun L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):396-407. PubMed ID: 17410553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study designs for genome-wide association studies.
    Kraft P; Cox DG
    Adv Genet; 2008; 60():465-504. PubMed ID: 18358330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Universal false discovery rate estimation methodology for genome-wide association studies.
    Forner K; Lamarine M; Guedj M; Dauvillier J; Wojcik J
    Hum Hered; 2008; 65(4):183-94. PubMed ID: 18073488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient two-stage genome-wide association designs based on false positive report probabilities.
    Kraft P
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():523-34. PubMed ID: 17094266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Powerful designs for genetic association studies that consider twins and sibling pairs with discordant genotypes.
    Wessel J; Schork AJ; Tiwari HK; Schork NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 17549743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal multistage designs--a general framework for efficient genome-wide association studies.
    Pahl R; Schäfer H; Müller HH
    Biostatistics; 2009 Apr; 10(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 19075295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of two-stage genetic designs where data are combined using an accurate and efficient approximation for Pearson's statistic.
    Bukszár J; van den Oord EJ
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1132-7. PubMed ID: 17156288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal DNA pooling-based two-stage designs in case-control association studies.
    Zhao Y; Wang S
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 18931509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Singleton SNPs in the human genome and implications for genome-wide association studies.
    Ke X; Taylor MS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Apr; 16(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 18197193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide association studies.
    Iles MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 713():89-103. PubMed ID: 21153613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible designs for genomewide association studies.
    Scherag A; Hebebrand J; Schäfer H; Müller HH
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 19173695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives on genome-wide multi-stage family-based association studies.
    Van Steen K
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(18):2201-21. PubMed ID: 21590702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Using two-stage case-control designs to study the genome-wide association].
    Ma ZJ; Yi HG; Zhao Y; Chen F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 31(10):1184-7. PubMed ID: 21162827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-stage designs applying methods differing in costs.
    Goll A; Bauer P
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(12):1519-26. PubMed ID: 17463029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.