These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17550039)

  • 41. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of antibacterial varnishes applied to root dentin on shear bond strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Korkmaz Y; Baseren M
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 18335735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars.
    Linn J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):479-85. PubMed ID: 7714419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss.
    Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Partial pulpotomy and tooth reconstruction of a crown-fractured permanent incisor: a case report.
    Svizero Nda R; Bresciani E; Francischone CE; Franco EB; Pereira JC
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(10):740-7. PubMed ID: 14620263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reattachment using a fragment from an extracted tooth to treat complicated coronal fracture.
    Demarco FF; de Moura FR; Tarquinio SB; Lima FG
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 18352937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
    Ausiello P; De Gee AJ; Rengo S; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
    Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials.
    Nomoto R; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 11445209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Restorative treatment on Class I and II restorations in primary molars: a survey of Brazilian dental schools.
    Motisuki C; Lima LM; dos Santos-Pinto L; Guelmann M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 30(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 16491976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
    Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An
    Mohammad N; Pattanaik S; Reddy TB; Animireddy D; Ankireddy S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 31496563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
    Atieh M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Treatment of crown fractures.
    Bakland LK; Milledge T; Nation W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Feb; 24(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 9063189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reinforcement of weakened cusps by adhesive restorative materials: an in-vitro study.
    Macpherson LC; Smith BG
    Br Dent J; 1995 May; 178(9):341-4. PubMed ID: 7766457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. In vitro investigation on extensively destroyed vital teeth: is fracture force a limiting factor for direct restoration?
    Schwindling FS; Hartmann T; Panagidis D; Krisam J; Rues S; Schmitter M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 41(12):920-7. PubMed ID: 25155353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Treatment of severe pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption of a permanent second molar.
    Davidovich E; Kreiner B; Peretz B
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15839399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalga.
    Holan G; Fuks AB; Ketlz N
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 12064493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with glass ionomer-composite resin systems.
    Joynt RB; Davis EL; Wieczkowski G; Williams DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jul; 62(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 2746538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.