These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17550185)

  • 21. Vocal analysis related to changes in frequency of pure tone auditory feedback.
    Lee SH; Lee KC; Ban JH; Lee NH; Jin SM
    Yonsei Med J; 2008 Aug; 49(4):610-4. PubMed ID: 18729303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback.
    Liu H; Meshman M; Behroozmand R; Larson CR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 122(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 20869305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurophysiological evidence of differential mechanisms involved in producing opposing and following responses to altered auditory feedback.
    Li W; Chen Z; Liu P; Zhang B; Huang D; Liu H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Nov; 124(11):2161-71. PubMed ID: 23751154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: a preliminary study.
    Burnett TA; Senner JE; Larson CR
    J Voice; 1997 Jun; 11(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 9181544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissimilarity and the classification of male singing voices.
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 17134873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's F0 range.
    Honorof DN; Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2193-200. PubMed ID: 15898660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Enhanced neural responses to self-triggered voice pitch feedback perturbations.
    Liu H; Behroozmand R; Larson CR
    Neuroreport; 2010 May; 21(7):527-31. PubMed ID: 20386347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early pitch-shift response is active in both steady and dynamic voice pitch control.
    Burnett TA; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1058-63. PubMed ID: 12243154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audio-vocal responses to repetitive pitch-shift stimulation during a sustained vocalization: improvements in methodology for the pitch-shifting technique.
    Bauer JJ; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1048-54. PubMed ID: 12942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory feedback control of voice fundamental frequency in school children.
    Liu P; Chen Z; Larson CR; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1306-12. PubMed ID: 20815465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback.
    Sivasankar M; Bauer JJ; Babu T; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):850-7. PubMed ID: 15759705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.
    Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laryngeal electromyographic responses to perturbations in voice pitch auditory feedback.
    Liu H; Behroozmand R; Bove M; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3946-54. PubMed ID: 21682416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of sensorimotor voice training on event-related potentials to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.
    Patel S; Hebert K; Korzyukov O; Larson CR
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0269326. PubMed ID: 36662730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of change in spectral slope and formant frequencies on the perception of loudness.
    Duvvuru S; Erickson M
    J Voice; 2013 Nov; 27(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 24075910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.
    Larson CR; Burnett TA; Bauer JJ; Kiran S; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):2845-8. PubMed ID: 11785786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ERP correlates of the magnitude of pitch errors detected in the human voice.
    Scheerer NE; Behich J; Liu H; Jones JA
    Neuroscience; 2013 Jun; 240():176-85. PubMed ID: 23466810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effects of Stress Type, Vowel Identity, Baseline f
    Park Y; Stepp CE
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):603-610. PubMed ID: 30078521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.