These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17550189)

  • 1. Effects of aging on word intelligibility and listening difficulty in various reverberant fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2915-22. PubMed ID: 17550189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces.
    Morimoto M; Sato H; Kobayashi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1607-13. PubMed ID: 15478426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms.
    Sato H; Bradley JS; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1157-67. PubMed ID: 15807005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Sato H; Wada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2087-93. PubMed ID: 18397016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Wada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4596-605. PubMed ID: 22712933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elderly listeners with low intelligibility scores under reverberation show degraded subcortical representation of reverberant speech.
    Fujihira H; Shiraishi K; Remijn GB
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():102-107. PubMed ID: 27884735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimum speech level to minimize listening difficulty in public spaces.
    Kobayashi M; Morimoto M; Sato H; Sato H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 17297780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Age on Listening Effort.
    Degeest S; Keppler H; Corthals P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 58(5):1592-600. PubMed ID: 26161899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults?
    Lu Z; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2655-2677. PubMed ID: 27566326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.