These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17550494)

  • 1. The cost of urogynaecological treatments: which are more cost-effective?
    Foote AJ; Moore KH
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jun; 47(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17550494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomised controlled trial of nurse continence advisor therapy compared with standard urogynaecology regimen for conservative incontinence treatment: efficacy, costs and two year follow up.
    Moore KH; O'Sullivan RJ; Simons A; Prashar S; Anderson P; Louey M
    BJOG; 2003 Jul; 110(7):649-57. PubMed ID: 12842055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic colposuspension versus vaginal suburethral slingplasty: a randomised prospective trial.
    Foote AJ; Maughan V; Carne C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 46(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 17116057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence?
    Wu JM; Visco AG; Weidner AC; Myers ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 197(1):62.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17618760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence.
    Ankardal M; Järbrink K; Milsom I; Heiwall B; Lausten-Thomsen N; Ellström-Engh M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(6):761-6. PubMed ID: 17610271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Dumville JC; Manca A; Kitchener HC; Smith AR; Nelson L; Torgerson DJ;
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16956333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence.
    Valpas A; Rissanen P; Kujansuu E; Nilsson CG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1485-90. PubMed ID: 17260226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aggressive and complex surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: an economic analysis.
    Aletti GD; Podratz KC; Moriarty JP; Cliby WA; Long KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 19027146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of botulinum toxin a versus anticholinergic medications for idiopathic urge incontinence.
    Wu JM; Siddiqui NY; Amundsen CL; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ; Visco AG
    J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2181-6. PubMed ID: 19296983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence using slings and meshes.
    Montesino-Semper MF; Jimenez-Calvo JM; Cabases JM; Sanchez-Iriso E; Hualde-Alfaro A; García-García D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):180-6. PubMed ID: 24035322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of 'comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)' implementation on the effectiveness and cost (CEA) of healthcare in an acute geriatric ward.
    Soejono CH
    Acta Med Indones; 2008 Jan; 40(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19054877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
    Jenkins TR; Liu CY
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17625411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms.
    South MM; Wu JM; Webster GD; Weidner AC; Roelands JJ; Amundsen CL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):564.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19249728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The incremental cost effectiveness of in-patient versus out-patient rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty - results of a pilot investigation.
    Krummenauer F; Günther KP; Witzlebf WC
    Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jun; 13(6):267-74. PubMed ID: 18558552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of electromagnetic stimulation of the pelvic floor vs sham therapy in the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Gilling PJ; Wilson LC; Westenberg AM; McAllister WJ; Kennett KM; Frampton CM; Bell DF; Wrigley PM; Fraundorfer MR
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(10):1386-90. PubMed ID: 19154474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost-effectiveness of routine office-based identification and subsequent medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States.
    Rein DB; Wittenborn JS; Lee PP; Wirth KE; Sorensen SW; Hoerger TJ; Saaddine JB
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):823-32. PubMed ID: 19285730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of group psychotherapy for depression in Uganda.
    Siskind D; Baingana F; Kim J
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2008 Sep; 11(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 18806302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is laparoscopic colectomy for cancer cost-effective relative to open colectomy?
    Hayes JL; Hansen P
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Sep; 77(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 17685959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of sevelamer in patients with end-stage renal disease.
    Manns B; Klarenbach S; Lee H; Culleton B; Shrive F; Tonelli M
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2867-78. PubMed ID: 17595182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.