These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17551133)
1. Testing pesticides in humans: of mice and men divided by ten. Krimsky S; Simoncelli T JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(21):2405-7. PubMed ID: 17551133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Critics claim even babies could be exposed to pesticides in research. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Aug; 20(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 16320460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pesticide testing. EPA draft rules for human subjects draw fire. Stokstad E Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):232. PubMed ID: 16002591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can pesticide tests on humans ever meet standards for ethics? Begley S Wall St J (East Ed); 2003 Jan; ():B1. PubMed ID: 12653118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Agency expands its human subject protections but questions remain. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 17058814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits and risks of pesticide testing on humans. Needleman HL; Reigart JR; Landrigan P; Sass J; Bearer C Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Dec; 113(12):A804-5; author reply A805. PubMed ID: 16330333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics. Testing pesticides on humans given qualified endorsement. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5662):1272-3. PubMed ID: 14988526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pesticide testing on humans is ethical, science panel says. Vedantam S Washington Post; 2004 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15022674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research. Rubinstein E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Why we need legal standards for pediatric research. Wendler D; Forster H J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 14760251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Moral responsiveness in pediatric research ethics. Moeller CJ Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W1-W3. PubMed ID: 14744302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Approval for pesticide toxicity testing in humans draws criticism. Mitka M JAMA; 2006 Mar; 295(11):1237-8. PubMed ID: 16537728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Human experimentation at the brink of life. Oliver AA GMU Law Rev; 2001; 9(4):1177-203. PubMed ID: 15233133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Indecision over human pesticide data. Dove A Nat Med; 1999 Sep; 5(9):972. PubMed ID: 10471263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pesticide tests on humans cause concern. Wadman M Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6693):515. PubMed ID: 9707105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pesticide testing on human subjects: weighing benefits and risks. Resnik DB; Portier C Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Jul; 113(7):813-7. PubMed ID: 16002367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The law and human experimentation. Simmonds R Univ Ghana Law J; 1973; 10(2):81-102. PubMed ID: 11663022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Finding a direction for pediatric assent. Manning S J Pediatr; 2007 Apr; 150(4):e38. PubMed ID: 17382100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cold war at Porton Down: informed consent in Britain's biological and chemical warfare experiments. Schmidt U Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2006; 15(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 17066763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assent and dissent in 407 research with children. Murphy TF Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 14744313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]