BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17551999)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders.
    Halefoglu AM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2007 May; 13(18):2529-34. PubMed ID: 17551999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Coakley FV; Schwartz LH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Feb; 9(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 10077008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical applications of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography].
    Soto JA; Castrillón GA
    Radiologia; 2007; 49(6):389-96. PubMed ID: 18021667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
    Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [MRI cholangiopancreatography in the pathology of the bile ducts and pancreas].
    Taourel P; Calvet C; Lecesne R; Pradel JA; Drouillard J; Bruel JM
    J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 78(9):615-21. PubMed ID: 9537179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
    Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
    Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with a small field-of-view and high resolution acquisition: Clinical feasibility in biliary and pancreatic disorders.
    Zhu L; Xue H; Sun Z; Qian T; Weiland E; Kuehn B; Asbach P; Hamm B; Jin Z
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1389-1399. PubMed ID: 29656611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
    Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
    Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic efficacy of non-breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Kuo YT; Jaw TS; Wang CK; Lee LW; Shen PC; Liu GC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Feb; 98(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10083764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts.
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Fabiano S; Passariello R
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1513-22. PubMed ID: 10525858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR cholangiopancreatography of the pancreas and biliary system: a review of the current applications.
    Hossary SH; Zytoon AA; Eid M; Hamed A; Sharaan M; Ebrahim AA
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 24290199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.
    Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new technique for evaluating the biliary tract and pancreatic duct.
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Zfass AM
    Gastroenterologist; 1998 Mar; 6(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9531120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
    Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
    Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: past, present and future: a review.
    Maccioni F; Martinelli M; Al Ansari N; Kagarmanova A; De Marco V; Zippi M; Marini M
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2010 Aug; 14(8):721-5. PubMed ID: 20707292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.
    Hekimoglu K; Ustundag Y; Dusak A; Erdem Z; Karademir B; Aydemir S; Gundogdu S
    J Dig Dis; 2008 Aug; 9(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 18956595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Laing AD; Gibson RN
    Australas Radiol; 1999 Aug; 43(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 10901920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography study of pancreaticobiliary maljunction and pancreaticobiliary diseases.
    Wang CL; Ding HY; Dai Y; Xie TT; Li YB; Cheng L; Wang B; Tang RH; Nie WX
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 20(22):7005-10. PubMed ID: 24944495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.