These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17552387)

  • 1. Comparison of ultrasonic energy expenditures and corneal endothelial cell density reductions during modulated and non-modulated phacoemulsification.
    Davison JA
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2007; 38(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 17552387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 1.1 mm TurboSonics and 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips.
    Davison JA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):1386-91. PubMed ID: 10511940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic power reduction during phacoemulsification using adjunctive NeoSoniX technology.
    Davison JA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1015-9. PubMed ID: 15975472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal endothelial morphology and function after torsional and longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification.
    Módis LJ; Szalai E; Flaskó Z; Németh G
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 29450332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Infiniti vision and the series 20,000 Legacy systems.
    Fernández de Castro LE; Solomon KD; Hu DJ; Vroman DT; Sandoval HP
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 18303229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 1.1 mm TurboSonics and 0.9 mm MicroTip.
    Davison JA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):1382-5. PubMed ID: 10511939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bimanual microincision phacoemulsification in treating hard cataracts using different power modes.
    Liu Y; Jiang Y; Wu M; Liu Y; Zhang T
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Jul; 36(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 18939349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of endothelial mucin layer thickness after phacoemulsification with next generation ophthalmic irrigating solution.
    Ghate DA; Holley G; Dollinger H; Bullock JP; Markwardt K; Edelhauser HF
    Cornea; 2008 Oct; 27(9):1050-6. PubMed ID: 18812770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of torsional and microburst longitudinal phacoemulsification: a prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial.
    Vasavada AR; Raj SM; Patel U; Vasavada V; Vasavada V
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20128580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Influence AquaLase at corneal endothelial cells].
    Jirásková N; Rozsíval P; Ludvíková M; Burova M; Nekolová J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jul; 65(4):139-42. PubMed ID: 19750831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of continuous ultrasonic phacoemulsification with anterior chamber maintainer on corneal endothelial damage in hard nuclear cataract.
    Chen G; Wang D; Du Y; Huang H
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 25588590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
    Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by using bimanual microincision phacoemulsification and power modulation.
    Mathys KC; Cohen KL; Armstrong BD
    Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17893532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect on corneal endothelial cell loss during phacoemulsification: fortified balanced salt solution versus Ringer lactate.
    Nayak BK; Shukla RO
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22832531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study.
    Vasavada V; Vasavada V; Raj SM; Vasavada AR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17531697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thermal imaging comparison of Signature, Infiniti, and Stellaris phacoemulsification systems.
    Ryoo NK; Kwon JW; Wee WR; Miller KM; Han YK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 13():53. PubMed ID: 24118895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 straight and flared 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips.
    Davison JA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jan; 28(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 11777713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.
    Chen M; Anderson E; Hill G; Chen JJ; Patrianakos T
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1367-72. PubMed ID: 26229430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In-air thermal imaging comparison of Legacy AdvanTec, Millennium, and Sovereign WhiteStar phacoemulsification systems.
    Olson MD; Miller KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1640-7. PubMed ID: 16129304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.