These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17552475)
1. Extending the CLAST sequential rule to one-way ANOVA under group sampling. Ximénez C; Revuelta J Behav Res Methods; 2007 Feb; 39(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 17552475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of sample size in controlled experiments: the CLAST rule. Botella J; Ximénez C; Revuelta J; Suero M Behav Res Methods; 2006 Feb; 38(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 16817515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consequences of sequential sampling for meta-analysis. Braschi L; Botella J; Suero M Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1167-83. PubMed ID: 24399083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variable criteria sequential stopping rule: Validity and power with repeated measures ANOVA, multiple correlation, MANOVA and relation to Chi-square distribution. Fitts DA Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1988-2003. PubMed ID: 28936614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-arm group sequential designs with a simultaneous stopping rule. Urach S; Posch M Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(30):5536-5550. PubMed ID: 27550822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA based on a modified one-step M-estimator. Wilcox RR; Keselman HJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):15-25. PubMed ID: 12803819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of the triangular test with response-adaptive treatment allocation. Coad DS; Ivanova A Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1483-93. PubMed ID: 15706635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute precision confidence intervals for unstandardized mean differences using sequential stopping rules. Fitts DA Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):1839-1862. PubMed ID: 35768742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The variable-criteria sequential stopping rule: generality to unequal sample sizes, unequal variances, or to large ANOVAs. Fitts DA Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):918-29. PubMed ID: 21139159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests. Sanborn AN; Hills TT Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 24101570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of the Coefficient of Variation with Minimum Risk: A Sequential Method for Minimizing Sampling Error and Study Cost. Chattopadhyay B; Kelley K Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):627-648. PubMed ID: 27712116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Maxwell SE; Kelley K; Rausch JR Annu Rev Psychol; 2008; 59():537-63. PubMed ID: 17937603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inverse adaptive cluster sampling. Christman MC; Lan F Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1096-105. PubMed ID: 11764249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results. Wright DB Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Sep; 76(Pt 3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16953968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved stopping rules for the design of efficient small-sample experiments in biomedical and biobehavioral research. Fitts DA Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 20160281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials. Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups. Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]