157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17552714)
1. Low-frequency characteristics of human and guinea pig cochleae.
Marquardt T; Hensel J; Mrowinski D; Scholz G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3628-38. PubMed ID: 17552714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.
Rhode WS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2725-37. PubMed ID: 18189565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
Williams EJ; Bacon SP
Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of infrasound on the human cochlea.
Hensel J; Scholz G; Hurttig U; Mrowinski D; Janssen T
Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):67-76. PubMed ID: 17761395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.
Long GR; Talmadge CL; Lee J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1613-26. PubMed ID: 19045653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae.
Rhode WS; Cooper NP
Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 8473244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing at low and infrasonic frequencies.
Møller H; Pedersen CS
Noise Health; 2004; 6(23):37-57. PubMed ID: 15273023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
Sun XM
Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of velocity distortion product otoacoustic emissions for estimating mechanically based hearing loss.
Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Müller M; Zenner HP; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):17-28. PubMed ID: 19233253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear mechanisms at low frequencies in the guinea pig.
Franke R; Dancer A
Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 7092710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple electrical lumped-element model simulates intra-cochlear sound pressures and cochlear impedance below 2 kHz.
Marquardt T; Hensel J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3730-8. PubMed ID: 24180783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
Abel C; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
