These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17552730)

  • 1. Spectral weighting strategies for sentences measured by a correlational method.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3827-36. PubMed ID: 17552730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral weighting strategies for hearing-impaired listeners measured using a correlational method.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2367-78. PubMed ID: 18397039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-weighting functions for broadband speech as estimated by a correlational method.
    Turner CW; Kwon BJ; Tanaka C; Knapp J; Hubbartt JL; Doherty KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1580-5. PubMed ID: 9745741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Harvey LO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1150-64. PubMed ID: 17672661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal-hearing subjects' perception of speech through one-third octave bands.
    Danhauer JL; Chari NC; Herman G
    J Aud Res; 1977 Oct; 17(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 617816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming.
    Allen K; Carlile S; Alais D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1562-70. PubMed ID: 18345844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in spectral-shape discrimination weighting functions at different stimulus levels and signal strengths.
    Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1702. PubMed ID: 17927430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a correlational method to estimate a listener's weighting function for speech.
    Doherty KA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3769-73. PubMed ID: 8969478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of lung volume initiation on speech: a perceptual study.
    Milstein CF; Watson PJ
    J Voice; 2004 Mar; 18(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 15070222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.
    Litvak LM; Spahr AJ; Saoji AA; Fridman GY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):982-91. PubMed ID: 17672646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.