BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17553604)

  • 1. Attentional orienting across the sensory modalities.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Slagter HA; Cipriani G
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17553604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study.
    Talsma D; Slagter HA; Nieuwenhuis S; Hage J; Kok A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 15925498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task.
    Jolicoeur P; Brisson B; Robitaille N
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():160-72. PubMed ID: 18482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neural correlates of attention orienting in visuospatial working memory for detecting feature and conjunction changes.
    Yeh YY; Kuo BC; Liu HL
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
    Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatio-temporal dynamics of top-down control: directing attention to location and/or color as revealed by ERPs and source modeling.
    Slagter HA; Kok A; Mol N; Kenemans JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):333-48. PubMed ID: 15722205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intermodal spatial attention differs between vision and audition: an event-related potential analysis.
    Talsma D; Kok A
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):689-706. PubMed ID: 12462498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrocortical correlates of control of selective attention to spatial frequency.
    Grent-'t-Jong T; Böcker KB; Kenemans JL
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 16690039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modality-independent processes in cued motor preparation revealed by cortical potentials.
    Diaconescu AO; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 18625564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An event-related potential study of supramodal attentional control and crossmodal attention effects.
    Green JJ; McDonald JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16712586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional parcellation of attentional control regions of the brain.
    Woldorff MG; Hazlett CJ; Fichtenholtz HM; Weissman DH; Dale AM; Song AW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 15006044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of visual reliability on auditory-visual integration: an event-related potential study.
    Liu Q; Qiu J; Chen A; Yang J; Zhang Q; Sun HJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Nov; 18(17):1861-5. PubMed ID: 18090327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic versus contingent mechanisms of sensory-driven neural biasing and reflexive attention.
    Hopfinger JB; Ries AJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1341-52. PubMed ID: 16197688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.