These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17554103)

  • 1. Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Campbell RB; Torrie A; Hecker A; Sekiya JK
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17554103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open screw fixation versus arthroscopic suture fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries: a mechanical comparison.
    Sasaki SU; da Mota e Albuquerque RF; Amatuzzi MM; Pereira CA
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1226-30. PubMed ID: 17986411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
    Gupta A; Lattermann C; Busam M; Riff A; Bach BR; Wang VM
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary stability of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Kitamura N; Yasuda K; Tohyama H; Yamanaka M; Tanabe Y
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):970-8. PubMed ID: 16084295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An anatomical and biomechanical comparison of anteromedial and anterolateral approaches for tibial tunnel of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the widening effect of the anterolateral approach.
    Ahn JH; Bae JH; Lee YS; Choi K; Bae TS; Wang JH
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Sep; 37(9):1777-83. PubMed ID: 19470944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction.
    Kim SJ; Choi CH; Kim HS
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jul; 20 Suppl 2():149-54. PubMed ID: 15243450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of cross-pin versus interference screw tibial fixation using a soft-tissue graft during transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Lee YS; Wang JH; Bae JH; Lim HC; Park JH; Ahn JH; Bae TS; Lim BO
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Sep; 25(9):989-95. PubMed ID: 19732637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament using tibial-inlay and double-bundle technique.
    Kim SJ; Park IS
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1271. PubMed ID: 16226662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open tibial inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
    Panchal HB; Sekiya JK
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Sep; 27(9):1289-95. PubMed ID: 21831568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Margheritini F; Rihn JA; Mauro CS; Stabile KJ; Woo SL; Harner CD
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1164-71. PubMed ID: 16226642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament allograft tendons: comparison of 1-, 2-, and 4-stranded constructs.
    Park DK; Fogel HA; Bhatia S; Bach BR; Gupta A; Shewman EF; Wang V; Verma N; Provencher MT
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 19460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolgate fixation of doubled flexor graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading.
    Ferretti A; Conteduca F; Labianca L; Monaco E; De Carli A
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Apr; 33(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 15788732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between a retrograde interference screw, suture button, and combined fixation on the tibial side in an all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in a porcine model.
    Walsh MP; Wijdicks CA; Parker JB; Hapa O; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 18832342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tibial fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of bovine bone screw and biodegradable interference screw.
    Zheng N; Price CT; Indelicato PA; Gao B
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Dec; 36(12):2322-7. PubMed ID: 18765676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [An experimental study of split-double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in single femoral tunnel].
    Tao C; Wang W; He A
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 21(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 17882876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the split stacked versus the split achilles allograft for dual femoral tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    DeBerardino TM; Lonergan KT; Brooks DE
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jan; 36(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 17873155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does a tensioning device pinned to the tibia improve knee anterior-posterior load-displacement compared to manual tensioning of the graft following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A cadaveric study of two tibial fixation devices.
    Thompson DM; Hull ML; Howell SM
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1832-41. PubMed ID: 16865723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 1:1 versus the 2:2 tunnel-drilling technique: optimization of fixation strength and stiffness in an all-inside double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction--a biomechanical study.
    Walsh MP; Wijdicks CA; Armitage BM; Westerhaus BD; Parker JB; Laprade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):1539-47. PubMed ID: 19460812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.
    MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.