These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1755469)

  • 1. Effectiveness and acceptibility of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in Germany.
    Frank-Herrmann P; Freundl G; Baur S; Bremme M; Döring GK; Godehardt EA; Sottong U
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):2052-4. PubMed ID: 1755469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual behavior of natural family planning users in Germany and its changes over time.
    Gnoth C; Frank-Herrmann P; Freundl G; Kunert J; Godehardt E
    Adv Contracept; 1995 Jun; 11(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 7491858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989-1992): interim results. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups.
    Adv Contracept; 1993 Dec; 9(4):269-83. PubMed ID: 8147240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural family planning with and without barrier method use in the fertile phase: efficacy in relation to sexual behavior: a German prospective long-term study.
    Frank-Herrmann P; Freundl G; Gnoth C; Godehardt E; Kunert J; Baur S; Sottong U
    Adv Contracept; 1997; 13(2-3):179-89. PubMed ID: 9288336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural family planning effectiveness in Belgium.
    De Leizaola-Cordonnier A
    Adv Contracept; 1995 Jun; 11(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 7491857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More about natural family planning.
    Gallagher J
    Aust Fam Physician; 1983 Nov; 12(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 6667188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning.
    Wade ME; McCarthy P; Braunstein GD; Abernathy JR; Suchindran CM; Harris GS; Danzer HC; Uricchio WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 141(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 7025639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symptothermal and hormonal markers of potential fertility in climacteric women.
    Flynn AM; James P; Collins WP; Royston P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):1987-9. PubMed ID: 1755454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural family planning and sex selection: fact or fiction?
    Gray RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):1982-4. PubMed ID: 1836712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The 1st phase of a prospective study of the effectiveness of natural family planning conducted in French-speaking Belgium].
    De Leizaola MA
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 8051361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Frank-Herrmann P; Heil J; Gnoth C; Toledo E; Baur S; Pyper C; Jenetzky E; Strowitzki T; Freundl G
    Hum Reprod; 2007 May; 22(5):1310-9. PubMed ID: 17314078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in lactating women after the return of menses.
    Zinaman M; Stevenson W
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):2037-9. PubMed ID: 1755465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and prediction of the fertile window with a new web-based medical device using a vaginal biosensor for measuring the circadian and circamensual core body temperature.
    Regidor PA; Kaczmarczyk M; Schiweck E; Goeckenjan-Festag M; Alexander H
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2018 Mar; 34(3):256-260. PubMed ID: 29082805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Natural family planning": effective birth control supported by the Catholic Church.
    Ryder RE
    BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):723-6. PubMed ID: 8401097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ovulation method use during breastfeeding: is there increased risk of unplanned pregnancy?
    Labbok MH; Stallings RY; Shah F; Pérez A; Klaus H; Jacobson M; Muruthi T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):2031-6. PubMed ID: 1755464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex ratio associated with timing of insemination and length of the follicular phase in planned and unplanned pregnancies during use of natural family planning.
    Gray RH; Simpson JL; Bitto AC; Queenan JT; Li C; Kambic RT; Perez A; Mena P; Barbato M; Stevenson W; Jennings V
    Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13(5):1397-400. PubMed ID: 9647580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. I. The teaching phase.
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Aug; 36(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 7021189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Abstinence and Coital Frequency Between 2 Natural Methods of Family Planning.
    Fehring RJ; Schneider M
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(5):528-32. PubMed ID: 26227903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European multicenter study of natural family planning (1989-1995): efficacy and drop-out. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups.
    Adv Contracept; 1999; 15(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 10794048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new diagnostic aid for natural family planning.
    Barbato M; Pandolfi A; Guida M
    Adv Contracept; 1993 Dec; 9(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 8147248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.