These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1755492)

  • 1. [Echographic and morphological parallels in the evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar].
    Lebedev VA; Strizhakov AN; Zheleznov BI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):44-9. PubMed ID: 1755492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Use of echography in the management of labor in women with uterine scar after cesarean section].
    Belousov MA; Mareeva LS; Mel'nikov AP
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):49-50. PubMed ID: 1755493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
    Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior Cesarean section predict uterine rupture?
    Jastrow N; Vikhareva O; Gauthier RJ; Irion O; Boulvain M; Bujold E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 26483275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Prognosis of delivery from a scared uterus: 123 cases].
    Ben Brahim F; Zeghal D; Mahjoub S; Ben Hmid R; Zouari F
    Tunis Med; 2008 Nov; 86(11):987-91. PubMed ID: 19213490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complication of cesarean section: pregnancy on the cicatrix of a previous cesarean section.
    Wang W; Long W; Yu Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2002 Feb; 115(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 11940341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rupture of the scarred uterus.
    Grossetti E; Vardon D; Creveuil C; Herlicoviez M; Dreyfus M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 17464586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The ultrasonic assessment of the cicatrix after a past cesarean section].
    Popov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1994; 33(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 7485767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Detection of uterine scar defect during pregnancy by ultrasonics].
    Yang TZ; Li WZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Aug; 29(8):458-60, 508-9. PubMed ID: 7835114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Is palpation of the healed section scar after previous Cesarean section with subsequent vaginal delivery necessary?].
    Burmucic R; Hofmann P
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():76-7. PubMed ID: 1286352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal survival following posterior uterine wall rupture during labour with intact previous caesarean section scar.
    Majumdar S; Warren R; Ifaturoti O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Nov; 276(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 17440745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gynecological and postpartum ultrasonography of cesarean uterine scar defects: a pictorial essay.
    El Agwany AS
    J Ultrasound; 2020 Dec; 23(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 31482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Uterine scar after caeserean section- predicting the risk of uterine rupture and decision on the way of delivery].
    Tzankova M; Nikolov A; Pirnareva E
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2014; 53(4):29-32. PubMed ID: 25510068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of dystocia and previous cesarean uterine scar on the tensile properties of the lower uterine segment.
    Buhimschi CS; Buhimschi IA; Yu C; Wang H; Sharer DJ; Diamond MP; Petkova AP; Garfield RE; Saade GR; Weiner CP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):873-83. PubMed ID: 16522428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth.
    Basic E; Basic-Cetkovic V; Kozaric H; Rama A
    Med Arch; 2012; 66(3 Suppl 1):41-4. PubMed ID: 22937691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
    Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Is systematic examination using uterine revision of the anterior segment cesarean section scar justified after a successful uterine test?].
    Venditelli F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(7):836. PubMed ID: 7822721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Manual palpation of the uterine scar following vaginal delivery in previous cesarean section--is it really necessary?].
    Yilmaztürk A; Schlüter W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(13):773-5. PubMed ID: 1927128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.