These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1755492)

  • 21. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
    Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
    Ofili-Yebovi D; Ben-Nagi J; Sawyer E; Yazbek J; Lee C; Gonzalez J; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18061960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The protrusions from the cervical canal at the scar of a previous cesarean section.
    van Vugt PJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979; 58(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 393052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus.
    Rozenberg P; Goffinet F; Phillippe HJ; Nisand I
    Lancet; 1996 Feb; 347(8997):281-4. PubMed ID: 8569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The problems and outlook for delivery in pregnant women with uterine scars following cesarean section].
    Mareeva LS; Levashova II; Mel'nikov AP; Zaĭtseva ZS; Belousov MA; Oberg OK
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1993; (1):22-7. PubMed ID: 8317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sonographic diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy at 16 weeks.
    Smith A; Ash A; Maxwell D
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 May; 35(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 17366559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Acceptability of repeated cesarean section uterine scar due to resection as a cause for the repeated cesarean section].
    Yamamura H; Yoshida S
    Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1967 Dec; 16(12):1093-101. PubMed ID: 5632117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cesarean scar imaging and prediction of subsequent obstetric complications.
    Varner M
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 55(4):988-96. PubMed ID: 23090468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uterine scar assessment: how should it be done before trial of labor after cesarean delivery?
    Spong CY; Queenan JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):521-522. PubMed ID: 21343752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.
    Ryo E; Sakurai R; Kamata H; Seto M; Morita M; Ayabe T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 27033868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Induced termination of second and third trimester pregnancy in women with scarred uterus].
    Zou LY; Fan L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jan; 45(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20367920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section by echography].
    Titchenko LI; Belousov MA; Zhilenko MI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Nov; (11):69-70. PubMed ID: 2077921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
    Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Spontaneous uterine rupture along the scar following cesarean section in the lower segment of the uterus].
    Prochorow M; Lazar W
    Ginekol Pol; 1972 Apr; 43(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 4666606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intrapartum posterior uterine wall rupture in lower segment cesarean section scarred uterus.
    Singhal SR; Agarwal U; Sangwan K; Khosla A; Singhal S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Feb; 84(2):196-7. PubMed ID: 15683383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Rupture of the uterine cicatrix in vaginal delivery after a prior cesarean section].
    Lazarov L
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(5):15-9. PubMed ID: 2091467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Uharček P; Brešťanský A; Ravinger J; Máňová A; Zajacová M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):609-12. PubMed ID: 25814295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparative study of the lower uterine segment after Cesarean section using ultrasound and magnetic resonance tomography].
    Hebisch G; Kirkinen P; Haldemann R; Pääkköö E; Huch A; Huch R
    Ultraschall Med; 1994 Jun; 15(3):112-6. PubMed ID: 8091195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.