115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17555170)
1. A clinical study on interdental separation techniques.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters FJ; Dörfer CE
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 17555170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proximal marginal overhang of composite restorations in relation to placement technique of separation rings.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Huysmans MC
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 21942287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations.
Saber MH; Loomans BA; El Zohairy A; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20166409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 17153978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 19524348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness of Class II restorations.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters JF; Bronkhorst EM; Plasschaert AJ
J Adhes Dent; 2006 Oct; 8(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 17080878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proximal contact tightness between direct-composite additions in the posterior dentition: an in vitro investigation.
Wolff D; Hahn P; Ding P; Maier-Kraus T; Frese C; Doerfer C; Staehle HJ
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 22313273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term effect of a composite resin restoration on proximal contact tightness.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Plasschaert AJ
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 16904254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations.
Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC; Dörfer CE
J Dent; 2006 Apr; 34(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 16157438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations.
Kampouropoulos D; Paximada C; Loukidis M; Kakaboura A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 20672731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the proximal contact tightness in class II resin composite restorations using different contact forming instruments: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
Abbassy KM; Elmahy WA; Holiel AA
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):729. PubMed ID: 37805456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction.
Chuang SF; Su KC; Wang CH; Chang CH
J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 21504778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness and surface geometry in class II direct composite restoration in-vitro.
Tolba ZO; Oraby E; Abd El Aziz PM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):535. PubMed ID: 37533048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations.
Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Pereira CL; Lund RG; de Carvalho RM
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study of microleakage in Class II composite restorations using four different curing techniques.
Gharizadeh N; Moradi K; Haghighizadeh MH
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17695605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
