These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations. Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations. Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations. Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results. Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration. Kwon OH; Kim DH; Park SH Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 20672729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations. Awliya WY; El-Sahn AM Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18335730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Frankenberger R; Tay FR Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results. Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microshear bond strength of resin composite to teeth affected by molar hypomineralization using 2 adhesive systems. William V; Burrow MF; Palamara JE; Messer LB Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16805355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]