369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17555266)
1. Accuracy of two heterogeneity dose calculation algorithms for IMRT in treatment plans designed using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.
Davidson SE; Ibbott GS; Prado KL; Dong L; Liao Z; Followill DS
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1850-7. PubMed ID: 17555266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the Radiological Physics Center's anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing.
Kry SF; Alvarez P; Molineu A; Amador C; Galvin J; Followill DS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jan; 85(1):e95-100. PubMed ID: 23237006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms.
Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5000-6. PubMed ID: 19994509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB with collapsed cone convolution/superposition and anisotropic analytic algorithm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of thoracic spinal metastases.
Zhen H; Hrycushko B; Lee H; Timmerman R; Pompoš A; Stojadinovic S; Foster R; Jiang SB; Solberg T; Gu X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):181–192. PubMed ID: 26219014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhao Y; Qi G; Yin G; Wang X; Wang P; Li J; Xiao M; Li J; Kang S; Liao X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():287. PubMed ID: 25511623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning.
Chamberland E; Beaulieu L; Lachance B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):4636. PubMed ID: 26103470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator.
Sterpin E; Tomsej M; De Smedt B; Reynaert N; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1665-77. PubMed ID: 17555248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Verification of four-dimensional photon dose calculations.
Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3438-47. PubMed ID: 19746777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.
Davidson SE; Popple RA; Ibbott GS; Followill DS
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5434-9. PubMed ID: 19175103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle(3) radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons.
Bedford JL; Childs PJ; Nordmark Hansen V; Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Verhaegen F; Warrington AP
Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):163-76. PubMed ID: 12684232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of dose calculation algorithms for static and rotational IMRT of lung cancer: A phantom study.
Sini C; Broggi S; Fiorino C; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Phys Med; 2015 Jun; 31(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 25801284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for IMRT in lung: a 2D approach.
Dvorak P; Stock M; Kroupa B; Bogner J; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(7):928-36. PubMed ID: 17917824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The implementation of an advanced treatment planning algorithm in the treatment of lung cancer with conventional radiotherapy.
Pearson M; Atherton P; McMenemin R; McDonald F; Mazdai G; Mulvenna P; Lambert G
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Apr; 21(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 19162457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
