These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only. Steven K; Poulsen AL J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The concept of lymph node density--is it ready for clinical practice? Herr HW J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1273-5; discussion 1275-6. PubMed ID: 17382708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [New markers for pharmacological targeting in bladder cancer with lymph node metastasis]. Herrmann E; Eltze E; Köpke T; Bolenz C; Bierer S; Neumann J; Hertle L; Wülfing C Aktuelle Urol; 2007 Sep; 38(5):392-7. PubMed ID: 17907066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy. Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Outcome of patients with grossly node positive bladder cancer after pelvic lymph node dissection and radical cystectomy. Thompson IM J Urol; 2001 Aug; 166(2):630. PubMed ID: 11458100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph node assessment and lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer. Sharir S; Fleshner NE J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 99(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 19235178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of American Joint Committee on Cancer pathologic stage T3a versus T3b urothelial carcinoma: analysis of patient outcomes. Boudreaux KJ; Chang SS; Lowrance WT; Rumohr JA; Barocas DA; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Clark PE Cancer; 2009 Feb; 115(4):770-5. PubMed ID: 19152431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic impact of pelvic lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion on bladder cancer. Herrmann E; Stöter E; van Ophoven A; Bierer S; Bolenz C; Hertle L; Wülfing C Int J Urol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):607-11. PubMed ID: 18462352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the outcome for invasive bladder cancer: the debate regarding pelvic lymphadenectomy moves from if to how. Catto JW Eur Urol; 2011 May; 59(5):719-20. PubMed ID: 21367517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The predictors of local recurrence after radical cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder cancer. Ide H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Ohigashi T; Nakashima J; Oya M Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 38(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 18490370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer. Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Separating surgical quality from causality--gaining perspective in the debate on lymph node count and extent of lymphadenectomy. Gilbert SM Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2331-3. PubMed ID: 18383514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinicopathologic features and utility of immunohistochemical markers in signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of the bladder. Thomas AA; Stephenson AJ; Campbell SC; Jones JS; Hansel DE Hum Pathol; 2009 Jan; 40(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 18789486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]