These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17556729)

  • 1. Stepwise advancement versus maximum jumping with headgear activator.
    Wey MC; Bendeus M; Peng L; Hägg U; Rabie AB; Robinson W
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 29(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 17556729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement.
    Hägg U; Rabie AB; Bendeus M; Wong RW; Wey MC; Du X; Peng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 18929270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.
    Du X; Hägg U; Rabie AB
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12001553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance].
    Du X; Hägg U
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 22(1):46-8, 51. PubMed ID: 15017700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance--effects and post-treatment changes.
    Phan KL; Bendeus M; Hägg U; Hansen K; Rabie AB
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17142260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment and posttreatment changes with combined headgear therapy.
    Tortop T; Yüksel S
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 17685765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
    Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.
    Oztürk Y; Tankuter N
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 8005202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change of mandibular position during two-phase orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II in the Chinese population.
    Cheung RN; Hägg U; Wong RW; Liao C; Yang Y
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():804831. PubMed ID: 25695103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.