These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17557591)

  • 1. Attentional templates regulate competitive interactions among attended visual objects.
    Mounts JR; McCarley JS; Terech AM
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 17557591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Localized attentional interference affects object individuation, not feature detection.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Perception; 2007; 36(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 17357703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of salience in localized attentional interference.
    Mounts JR; Gavett BE
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(13):1575-88. PubMed ID: 15126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial interference between attended items engenders serial visual processing.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS; Mounts JR; Kramer AF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):229-43. PubMed ID: 23143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An attention account of neural priming.
    Thakral PP; Jacobs CM; Slotnick SD
    Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):856-864. PubMed ID: 27666665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory: suppressions and enhancements revealed by FMRI.
    Vuilleumier P; Schwartz S; Duhoux S; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1245-60. PubMed ID: 16197681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms.
    Lu ZL; Dosher BA
    Vision Res; 1998 May; 38(9):1183-98. PubMed ID: 9666987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness.
    Most SB; Simons DJ; Scholl BJ; Jimenez R; Clifford E; Chabris CF
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Jan; 12(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 11294235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential sampling of visual objects during sustained attention.
    Jia J; Liu L; Fang F; Luo H
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):e2001903. PubMed ID: 28658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):902-12. PubMed ID: 25321485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarity of an unexpected object to the attended and ignored objects affects noticing in a sustained inattentional blindness task.
    Ding Y; Hults CM; Raja R; Simons DJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2150-2169. PubMed ID: 37794300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
    Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Object-based attention: sensory enhancement or scanning prioritization.
    Ho MC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21632030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 16056224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):946-62. PubMed ID: 9627427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Vuilleumier PO; Rafal RD
    Brain; 2000 Jun; 123 ( Pt 6)():1263-79. PubMed ID: 10825363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Martínez A; Teder-Salejarvi W; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1139():143-52. PubMed ID: 17288996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Viewers prefer predictive cues.
    Kuratomi K; Yoshizaki K
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Aug; 44():179-185. PubMed ID: 27512910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.