311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17558018)
1. Reliable assessment of laparoscopic performance in the operating room using videotape analysis.
Chang L; Hogle NJ; Moore BB; Graham MJ; Sinanan MN; Bailey R; Fowler DL
Surg Innov; 2007 Jun; 14(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 17558018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills.
Gumbs AA; Hogle NJ; Fowler DL
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Feb; 204(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 17254935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating intraoperative laparoscopic skill: direct observation versus blinded videotaped performances.
Vassiliou MC; Feldman LS; Fraser SA; Charlebois P; Chaudhury P; Stanbridge DD; Fried GM
Surg Innov; 2007 Sep; 14(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 17928621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construct validity of an objective assessment method for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying.
Van Sickle KR; Baghai M; Huang IP; Goldenberg A; Smith CD; Ritter EM
Am J Surg; 2008 Jul; 196(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 18417086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games?
Hogle NJ; Widmann WD; Ude AO; Hardy MA; Fowler DL
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 19059173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) in novice trainees performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Kramp KH; van Det MJ; Hoff C; Lamme B; Veeger NJ; Pierie JP
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 25441259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new web-based operative skills assessment tool effectively tracks progression in surgical resident performance.
Wohaibi EM; Earle DB; Ansanitis FE; Wait RB; Fernandez G; Seymour NE
J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):333-41. PubMed ID: 18063265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents' learning curve using hidden Markov model.
Rosen J; Solazzo M; Hannaford B; Sinanan M
Comput Aided Surg; 2002; 7(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 12173880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward feasible, valid, and reliable video-based assessments of technical surgical skills in the operating room.
Aggarwal R; Grantcharov T; Moorthy K; Milland T; Darzi A
Ann Surg; 2008 Feb; 247(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 18216547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.
Rosen J; Hannaford B; Richards CG; Sinanan MN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 48(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 11341532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic simulation training with proficiency targets improves practice and performance of novice surgeons.
Gauger PG; Hauge LS; Andreatta PB; Hamstra SJ; Hillard ML; Arble EP; Kasten SJ; Mullan PB; Cederna PS; Minter RM
Am J Surg; 2010 Jan; 199(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20103069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures--evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery.
Rosen J; MacFarlane M; Richards C; Hannaford B; Sinanan M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():290-6. PubMed ID: 10538374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structured assessment format for evaluating operative reports in general surgery.
Vergis A; Gillman L; Minor S; Taylor M; Park J
Am J Surg; 2008 Jan; 195(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 18082539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery.
Aggarwal R; Ward J; Balasundaram I; Sains P; Athanasiou T; Darzi A
Ann Surg; 2007 Nov; 246(5):771-9. PubMed ID: 17968168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Construct validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator: II. Assessment of discriminant validity and expert benchmarking.
Fried MP; Sadoughi B; Weghorst SJ; Zeltsan M; Cuellar H; Uribe JI; Sasaki CT; Ross DA; Jacobs JB; Lebowitz RA; Satava RM
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 17438249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a valid, cost-effective laparoscopic training program.
Adrales GL; Chu UB; Hoskins JD; Witzke DB; Park AE
Am J Surg; 2004 Feb; 187(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 14769299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental training in surgical education: a randomized controlled trial.
Immenroth M; Bürger T; Brenner J; Nagelschmidt M; Eberspächer H; Troidl H
Ann Surg; 2007 Mar; 245(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 17435545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-assessment during a 2-day laparoscopic colectomy course: can surgeons judge how well they are learning new skills?
Sidhu RS; Vikis E; Cheifetz R; Phang T
Am J Surg; 2006 May; 191(5):677-81. PubMed ID: 16647359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of assessing generic and specific technical skills in laparoscopic surgery.
Sarker SK; Chang A; Vincent C; Darzi SA
Am J Surg; 2006 Feb; 191(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 16442953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
