These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17558671)

  • 41. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.
    Ulahannan A; Cain R; Thompson S; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102969. PubMed ID: 31600714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand.
    Young KL; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):611-8. PubMed ID: 20828672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance.
    Chisholm SL; Caird JK; Lockhart J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):704-13. PubMed ID: 18329424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():389-95. PubMed ID: 26141907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results.
    de Winter JC; de Groot S; Mulder M; Wieringa PA; Dankelman J; Mulder JA
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):137-53. PubMed ID: 18972239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems.
    Maciej J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 19664428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Once a driver, always a driver - Manual driving style persists in automated driving takeover.
    de Winter JCF; Verschoor K; Doubek F; Happee R
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Nov; 121():104366. PubMed ID: 39178553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following.
    Saffarian M; Happee R; Winter JC
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):971-85. PubMed ID: 22804738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Age differences in cognitive and psychomotor abilities and simulated driving.
    Shanmugaratnam S; Kass SJ; Arruda JE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):802-8. PubMed ID: 20380906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The relationship between cell phone use and management of driver fatigue: It's complicated.
    Saxby DJ; Matthews G; Neubauer C
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():129-140. PubMed ID: 28454858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation.
    Patten CJ; Kircher A; Ostlund J; Nilsson L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 15003578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An evaluation of a lane support system for bus rapid transit on narrow shoulders and the relation to bus driver mental workload.
    Ward NJ; Shankwitz C; Gorgestani A; Donath M; De Waard D; Boer ER
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jul; 49(9):832-59. PubMed ID: 16801231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Speed maintenance under cognitive load - Implications for theories of driver behaviour.
    Lewis-Evans B; de Waard D; Brookhuis KA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1497-507. PubMed ID: 21545883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction.
    Noy YI; Lemoine TL; Klachan C; Burns PC
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 15145283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Manual transmission enhances attention and driving performance of ADHD adolescent males: pilot study.
    Cox DJ; Punja M; Powers K; Merkel RL; Burket R; Moore M; Thorndike F; Kovatchev B
    J Atten Disord; 2006 Nov; 10(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 17085632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.