These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17559450)

  • 1. Influence of local anaesthesia on the quality of class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Van de Hoef N; Van Amerongen E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2007 Jul; 17(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 17559450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Roeleveld AC; van Amerongen WE; Mandari GJ
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jun; 7(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 17140533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
    Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E
    SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is ART really atraumatic?
    van Amerongen WE; Rahimtoola S
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 10600077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of restorative treatment approaches and the use of local analgesia, on the children's discomfort.
    van Bochove JA; van Amerongen WE
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2006 Mar; 7(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
    Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
    Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.
    Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months.
    Lo EC; Luo Y; Tan HP; Dyson JE; Corbet EF
    J Dent Res; 2006 Oct; 85(10):929-32. PubMed ID: 16998134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
    Yassen G
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass lonomer cements.
    de Souza EM; Cefaly DF; Terada RS; Rodrigues CC; de Lima Navarro MF
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2003; 1(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 15641498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atraumatic perspectives of ART: psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments.
    Schriks MC; van Amerongen WE
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 31(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12542428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations.
    da Franca C; Colares V; Van Amerongen E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jul; 21(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21401749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Class I ART restorations in Brazilian schoolchildren: three-year results.
    Wang L; Lopes LG; Bresciani E; Lauris JR; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF
    Spec Care Dentist; 2004; 24(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 15157057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities.
    Koenraads H; Van der Kroon G; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 19211138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.