895 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17559537)
1. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
Hondrum SO
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
Erkut S; Can G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Erbe C; Wöstmann B
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 20416412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants.
DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T
Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.
Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8180615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
