These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17561002)

  • 1. The additional value of ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination for couples with an abnormal postcoital test and a poor prognosis: a randomized clinical trial.
    Steures P; van der Steeg JW; Hompes PG; Bossuyt PM; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Koks CA; Boudrez P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1618-24. PubMed ID: 17561002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with or without intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained infertility.
    Gregoriou O; Vitoratos N; Papadias C; Konidaris S; Gargaropoulos A; Louridas C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Jan; 48(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 7698384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men.
    Cohlen BJ; Vandekerckhove P; te Velde ER; Habbema JD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000360. PubMed ID: 10796711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Intra-uterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation compared to an expectant management in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised study].
    Steures P; van der Steeg JW; Hompes PG; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; Mol BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jul; 152(27):1525-31. PubMed ID: 18681363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrauterine insemination versus timed intercourse for cervical hostility in subfertile couples.
    Helmerhorst FM; van Vliet HA; Gornas T; Finken MJ; Grimes DA
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2006 Jun; 61(6):402-14; quiz 423. PubMed ID: 16719942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine insemination with gonadotropin stimulation or in vitro fertilization for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nandi A; Bhide P; Hooper R; Gudi A; Shah A; Khan K; Homburg R
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):1329-1335.e2. PubMed ID: 28501361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we identify subfertile couples that benefit from immediate in vitro fertilisation over intrauterine insemination?
    Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Tajik P; Custers IM; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; van Wely M; Mol BW; Zafarmand MH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jul; 202():36-40. PubMed ID: 27156154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Custers IM; König TE; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Kaaijk E; Oosterhuis J; Mochtar MH; Repping S; van Wely M; Steures P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1107-11.e1. PubMed ID: 21890134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination.
    Werbrouck E; Spiessens C; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Sep; 86(3):566-71. PubMed ID: 16952506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination for cervical factor subfertility improve pregnancy rates?
    Steures P; van der Steeg JW; Verhoeve HR; van Dop PA; Hompes PG; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Mol BW
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Oct; 19(10):2263-6. PubMed ID: 15333600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.
    Bensdorp AJ; Slappendel E; Koks C; Oosterhuis J; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans F; Verhoeve H; de Bruin JP; van Weert JM; Traas M; Maas J; Beckers N; Repping S; Mol BW; van der Veen F; van Wely M
    BMC Womens Health; 2009 Dec; 9():35. PubMed ID: 20021654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.
    Ayeleke RO; Asseler JD; Cohlen BJ; Veltman-Verhulst SM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Mar; 3(3):CD001838. PubMed ID: 32124980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' preferences in deciding between intrauterine insemination and expectant management.
    Steures P; Berkhout JC; Hompes PG; van der Steeg JW; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Mol BW
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Mar; 20(3):752-5. PubMed ID: 15640260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.
    Rakic L; Kostova E; Cohlen BJ; Cantineau AE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jul; 7(7):CD003854. PubMed ID: 34260059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is IUI with ovarian stimulation effective in couples with unexplained subfertility?
    van Eekelen R; van Geloven N; van Wely M; McLernon DJ; Mol F; Custers IM; Steures P; Bhattacharya S; Mol BW; van der Veen F; Eijkemans MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 30395266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial to determine optimal infertility treatment in older couples: the Forty and Over Treatment Trial (FORT-T).
    Goldman MB; Thornton KL; Ryley D; Alper MM; Fung JL; Hornstein MD; Reindollar RH
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1574-81.e1-2. PubMed ID: 24796764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
    van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/intrauterine insemination cycles in subfertile couples. Effect of a six-day-only laboratory work week on cycle fecundity rates.
    Karacan M; Shelden R; Corsan GH
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):767-70. PubMed ID: 8913980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography.
    Farhi J; Ben-Haroush A; Lande Y; Fisch B
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):396-400. PubMed ID: 17445812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.