423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17561329)
1. The economic value of water use: implications for implementing the Water Framework Directive in Scotland.
Moran D; Dann S
J Environ Manage; 2008 May; 87(3):484-96. PubMed ID: 17561329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive.
Hanley N; Wright RE; Alvarez-Farizo B
J Environ Manage; 2006 Jan; 78(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 16112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources of uncertainty in economic analysis of the Water Framework Directive.
Mysiak J; Sigel K
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):161-6. PubMed ID: 16304948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What does 'good ecological potential' mean, within the European Water Framework Directive?
Borja A; Elliott M
Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Oct; 54(10):1559-64. PubMed ID: 17903563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-benefit analysis and the water framework directive in Scotland.
Hanley N; Black AR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Apr; 2(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 16646384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application.
Birol E; Karousakis K; Koundouri P
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 365(1-3):105-22. PubMed ID: 16647102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept.
Del Saz-Salazar S; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(16):4574-83. PubMed ID: 19473689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: an empirical approach for Spain.
Hernández-Sancho F; Molinos-Senante M; Sala-Garrido R
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jan; 408(4):953-7. PubMed ID: 19903571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives.
de Jonge VN; Elliott M; Brauer VS
Mar Pollut Bull; 2006; 53(1-4):5-19. PubMed ID: 16426645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EU policy on nutrients emissions: legislation and implementation.
Blöch H
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11496659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis.
Molinos-Senante M; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4396-402. PubMed ID: 20667582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in European marine waters.
Devlin M; Best M; Haynes D
Mar Pollut Bull; 2007; 55(1-6):1-2. PubMed ID: 17055539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe--interpretation and harmonisation of the concept.
Heiskanen AS; van de Bund W; Cardoso AC; Nóges P
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(7):169-77. PubMed ID: 15195435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Who has to pay for measures in the field of water management? A proposal for applying the polluter pays principle.
Grünebaum T; Schweder H; Weyand M
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 19182349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of the WFD cost proportionality principle to diffuse pollution mitigation: a case study for Scottish Lochs.
Vinten AJ; Martin-Ortega J; Glenk K; Booth P; Balana BB; MacLeod M; Lago M; Moran D; Jones M
J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 97():28-37. PubMed ID: 22325580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future.
Hering D; Borja A; Carstensen J; Carvalho L; Elliott M; Feld CK; Heiskanen AS; Johnson RK; Moe J; Pont D; Solheim AL; de Bund Wv
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(19):4007-19. PubMed ID: 20557924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of E.U. Water Framework Directive: source assessment of metallic substances at catchment levels.
Chon HS; Ohandja DG; Voulvoulis N
J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 20081997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision of the EU Bathing Water Directive: economic costs and benefits.
Georgiou S; Bateman IJ
Mar Pollut Bull; 2005 Apr; 50(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 15823305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it worth protecting groundwater from diffuse pollution with agri-environmental schemes? A hydro-economic modeling approach.
Hérivaux C; Orban P; Brouyère S
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():62-74. PubMed ID: 23722175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recycling wastewater after hemodialysis: an environmental analysis for alternative water sources in arid regions.
Tarrass F; Benjelloun M; Benjelloun O
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Jul; 52(1):154-8. PubMed ID: 18589217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
