These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17561335)
1. Effect of lesion boundary conditions on axial strain elastograms: a parametric study. Thitaikumar A; Ophir J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1463-7. PubMed ID: 17561335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visualization of bonding at an inclusion boundary using axial-shear strain elastography: a feasibility study. Thitaikumar A; Krouskop TA; Garra BS; Ophir J Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2615-33. PubMed ID: 17440256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding the Contrast Mechanism in Rotation Elastogram: A Parametric Study. Lokesh B; Ten Dam AM; de Korte CL; Thittai AK Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1860-1872. PubMed ID: 29801975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rotation Elastogram Estimation Using Synthetic Transmit-aperture Technique: A Feasibility Study. B L; Chintada BR; Thittai AK Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):189-204. PubMed ID: 28091280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advances in finite element simulations of elastosonography for breast lesion detection. Celi S; Di Puccio F; Forte P J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081006. PubMed ID: 21950899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: II. experimental investigation. Berry GP; Bamber JC; Miller NR; Barbone PE; Bush NL; Armstrong CG Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1869-85. PubMed ID: 17169699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography. Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and their trade-offs with resolution in axial-shear strain elastography. Thitaikumar A; Krouskop TA; Ophir J Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 17183125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quantitative comparison of modulus images obtained using nanoindentation with strain elastograms. Srinivasan S; Krouskop T; Ophir J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):899-918. PubMed ID: 15313323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-transfer improvement for electrode displacement elastography. Bharat S; Varghese T Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6403-18. PubMed ID: 17148825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axial-shear strain distributions in an elliptical inclusion model: experimental validation and in vivo examples with implications to breast tumor classification. Thittai AK; Galaz B; Ophir J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 May; 36(5):814-20. PubMed ID: 20420971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analytic modeling of breast elastography. Liu HT; Sun LZ; Wang G; Vannier MW Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2340-9. PubMed ID: 14528956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fundamental mechanical limitations on the visualization of elasticity contrast in elastography. Ponnekanti H; Ophir J; Huang Y; Céspedes I Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 7571146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity]. Frey H Radiologe; 2003 Oct; 43(10):850-5. PubMed ID: 14605701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing elastographic strain images with modulus images obtained using nanoindentation: preliminary results using phantoms and tissue samples. Srinivasan S; Krouskop T; Ophir J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):329-43. PubMed ID: 15063515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the advantages of imaging the axial-shear strain component of the total shear strain in breast tumors. Thittai AK; Galaz B; Ophir J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):2031-7. PubMed ID: 22975036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]