BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17561829)

  • 1. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing.
    Tavabi K; Obleser J; Dobel C; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3155-62. PubMed ID: 17561829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels.
    Obleser J; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 15006034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-evoked magnetic field codes place of articulation in timing and topography around 100 milliseconds post syllable onset.
    Obleser J; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    Neuroimage; 2003 Nov; 20(3):1839-47. PubMed ID: 14642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Periodic glottal excitation and formant frequencies in the perception of vowels.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():103. PubMed ID: 16012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra-subject replication of brain magnetic activity during the processing of speech sounds.
    Eulitz C; Obleser J; Lahiri A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 14972361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional influences on functional mapping of speech sounds in human auditory cortex.
    Obleser J; Elbert T; Eulitz C
    BMC Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 5():24. PubMed ID: 15268765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Interhemispheric differences of the middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields revealed by a whole head magnetoencephalography system].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1995 Oct; 47(10):989-94. PubMed ID: 7577145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abnormal auditory cortical activation in dyslexia 100 msec after speech onset.
    Helenius P; Salmelin R; Richardson U; Leinonen S; Lyytinen H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 May; 14(4):603-17. PubMed ID: 12126501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
    Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars.
    Shestakova A; Brattico E; Soloviev A; Klucharev V; Huotilainen M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 15511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex.
    Bonte M; Parviainen T; Hytönen K; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jan; 16(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 15829731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm).
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry of syllable processing: left-lateralized magnetic N100 varies with syllable categorization in females.
    Obleser J; Rockstroh B; Eulitz C
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Sep; 41(5):783-8. PubMed ID: 15318884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delayed N100m latency in focal epilepsy associated with spike dipoles at the primary auditory cortex.
    Kubota Y; Otsuki T; Kaneko Y; Niimura K; Nakama H; Okazaki M
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 24(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 17545830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.