These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17562319)

  • 1. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.
    Lin MS; Fawzi NL; Head-Gordon T
    Structure; 2007 Jun; 15(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 17562319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
    Dominy BN; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.
    Zhou R
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):148-61. PubMed ID: 14517967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
    Tsai J; Bonneau R; Morozov AV; Kuhlman B; Rohl CA; Baker D
    Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
    Lee MC; Duan Y
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical analysis on changes in thermodynamic quantities upon protein folding: essential role of hydration.
    Imai T; Harano Y; Kinoshita M; Kovalenko A; Hirata F
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Jun; 126(22):225102. PubMed ID: 17581082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.
    Lazaridis T; Karplus M
    J Mol Biol; 1999 May; 288(3):477-87. PubMed ID: 10329155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free-energy function based on an all-atom model for proteins.
    Yoshidome T; Oda K; Harano Y; Roth R; Sugita Y; Ikeguchi M; Kinoshita M
    Proteins; 2009 Dec; 77(4):950-61. PubMed ID: 19688821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
    Liu S; Zhang C; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15162489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference of the solvation energy parameters of amino acids using maximum entropy approach.
    Hoang TX; Seno F; Trovato A; Banavar JR; Maritan A
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Jul; 129(3):035102. PubMed ID: 18647046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions.
    Gatchell DW; Dennis S; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2000 Dec; 41(4):518-34. PubMed ID: 11056039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
    Wroblewska L; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys.
    Rajgaria R; McAllister SR; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):950-70. PubMed ID: 17847088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A theoretical analysis on hydration thermodynamics of proteins.
    Imai T; Harano Y; Kinoshita M; Kovalenko A; Hirata F
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Jul; 125(2):24911. PubMed ID: 16848615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved Energy Selection of Nativelike Protein Loops from Loop Decoys.
    Lin MS; Head-Gordon T
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2008 Mar; 4(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 26620791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.