These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17562418)
1. A cadaveric study to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in locating the hip center during total knee arthroplasty. Picard F; Leitner F; Gregori A; Martin P J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 17562418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test bed for assessment of the kinematical determination of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty. Does a limited range of motion of the hip joint influence the accuracy of the determination? Schwarz ML; Pott PP; Beck A; Heute S; Scharf HP Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16199382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of the center of the hip joint in computer-assisted surgery: an evaluation study of the Surgetics algorithm. Stindel E; Gil D; Briard JL; Merloz P; Dubrana F; Lefevre C Comput Aided Surg; 2005 May; 10(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 16321910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of economic issues in computer-assisted total joint arthroplasty. Beringer DC; Patel JJ; Bozic KJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():26-30. PubMed ID: 17960672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. Lustig S; Fleury C; Goy D; Neyret P; Donell ST Knee; 2011 Jan; 18(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20060724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How accurate is Whiteside's line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty? Middleton FR; Palmer SH Knee; 2007 Jun; 14(3):204-7. PubMed ID: 17428665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of acetabular component positioning with a fluoroscopically referenced CAOS system. Stiehl JB; Heck DA; Lazzeri M Comput Aided Surg; 2005; 10(5-6):321-7. PubMed ID: 16410234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study. Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: an in vitro analysis. Lopomo N; Sun L; Zaffagnini S; Giordano G; Safran MR Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Mar; 25(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 20006913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical note: validation of a motion analysis system for measuring the relative motion of the intermediate component of a tripolar total hip arthroplasty prosthesis. Chen Q; Lazennec JY; Guyen O; Kinbrum A; Berry DJ; An KN Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jul; 27(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 15990067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An accurate and reproducible method for locating the joint line during a revision total knee arthroplasty. Mason M; Belisle A; Bonutti P; Kolisek FR; Malkani A; Masini M J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1147-53. PubMed ID: 17162174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of effect of sequential posteromedial release on flexion and extension gaps: a computer-assisted study in cadaveric knees. Mullaji A; Sharma A; Marawar S; Kanna R J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):795-805. PubMed ID: 18534536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty]. Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvic tracker effects on hip center accuracy using imageless navigation. Mihalko WM; Phillips MJ; Fishkin Z; Krackow KA Comput Aided Surg; 2006 Jul; 11(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 17060080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty]. Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The assessment of intraoperative prosthetic knee range of motion using two methods. Austin MS; Ghanem E; Joshi A; Trappler R; Parvizi J; Hozack WJ J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jun; 23(4):515-21. PubMed ID: 18514867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Yau WP; Leung A; Liu KG; Yan CH; Wong LL; Chiu KY J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1150-61. PubMed ID: 18078884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Decking R; Markmann Y; Mattes T; Puhl W; Scharf HP Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17623604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]