BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17563171)

  • 1. A note on using stratified alpha to estimate the composite reliability of a test composed of interrelated nonhomogeneous items.
    Rae G
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17563171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels.
    Rae G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):515-25. PubMed ID: 19017437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and true-score measures of binary items as a function of their Rasch difficulty parameter.
    Dimitrov DM
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):222-33. PubMed ID: 12904673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18649491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12741676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling decremental and inflationary effects in reliability estimation resulting from violations of assumptions.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):403-24. PubMed ID: 11783569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients.
    Kartal A; Ozsoy SA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Nov; 44(8):1447-58. PubMed ID: 17655849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
    Gwet KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting subscores for institutions.
    Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring barriers to incontinence care seeking.
    Heit M; Blackwell L; Kelly S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 17621356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of nonlinear factor-to-indicator relationships in tests of measurement equivalence.
    Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 16221030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equivalence tests for comparing correlation and regression coefficients.
    Counsell A; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):292-309. PubMed ID: 25346486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining change in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments.
    Raykov T; Hancock GR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):65-82. PubMed ID: 15969840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research.
    Peña ED
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(4):1255-64. PubMed ID: 17650137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between unstandardized and standardized alpha, true reliability, and the underlying measurement model.
    Falk CF; Savalei V
    J Pers Assess; 2011; 93(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 21859284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.