These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17563174)

  • 1. Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).
    Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):219-28; discussion 238-45. PubMed ID: 17563174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).
    Bagozzi RP
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):229-37; discussion 238-45. PubMed ID: 17563175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconsidering formative measurement.
    Howell RD; Breivik E; Wilcox JB
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 17563173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretational Confounding or Confounded Interpretations of Causal Indicators?
    Bainter SA; Bollen KA
    Measurement ( Mahwah N J); 2014; 12(4):125-140. PubMed ID: 25530730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A call for theory to support the use of causal-formative indicators: A commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos (2017).
    Hardin A
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):597-604. PubMed ID: 28891663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report.
    Bollen KA; Diamantopoulos A
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):581-596. PubMed ID: 26390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions.
    MacKenzie SB; Podsakoff PM; Jarvis CB
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):710-30. PubMed ID: 16060788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alternative approach to addressing missing indicators in parallel datasets: research utilization as a phantom latent variable.
    Midodzi WK; Hayduk L; Cummings GG; Estabrooks CA; Wallin L
    Nurs Res; 2007; 56(4 Suppl):S47-52. PubMed ID: 17625474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three Cs in measurement models: causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates.
    Bollen KA; Bauldry S
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):265-84. PubMed ID: 21767021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical application of the vanishing tetrad test for causal indicator measurement models: an example from health-related quality of life.
    Bollen KA; Lennox RD; Dahly DL
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1524-36. PubMed ID: 19266502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating causal parameters without target populations.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Oct; 13(5):814-6. PubMed ID: 17824877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Roaming through methodology. IV. Causality].
    van Gijn J; Rooijmans HG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(31):1765-7. PubMed ID: 9856141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A tetrad test for causal indicators.
    Bollen KA; Ting KF
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Mar; 5(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 10937320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing data: prevalence and reporting practices.
    Bodner TE
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Dec; 99(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17305182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
    Didelez V; Sheehan N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 17715159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction effects and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: more than meets the eye?
    Sevdalis N; Jacklin R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):919-22. PubMed ID: 18373582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal validity in rehabilitation research.
    Cook L; Rumrill PD
    Work; 2005; 25(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 16179777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From covariation to causation: a test of the assumption of causal power.
    Buehner MJ; Cheng PW; Clifford D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1119-40. PubMed ID: 14622051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.