These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17563225)

  • 1. Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm.
    Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):610-26. PubMed ID: 17563225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion.
    Navon D; Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 May; 44(3):193-251. PubMed ID: 11971632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Paelecke M; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):627-44. PubMed ID: 17563226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Sep; 57(2):75-121. PubMed ID: 18262510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):395-414. PubMed ID: 20364926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Carlsen AN; May C; Forgaard CJ; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():36-42. PubMed ID: 25919668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrepancy between reaction time and visual evoked magnetic response latency under priming.
    Hashimoto A; Inui K; Watanabe S; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Mar; 60(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 18177961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A PRP-study to determine the locus of target priming effects.
    Klapötke S; Krüger D; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):882-900. PubMed ID: 21570320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motor limitation in dual-task processing under ballistic movement conditions.
    Ulrich R; Fernández SR; Jentzsch I; Rolke B; Schröter H; Leuthold H
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):788-93. PubMed ID: 16984296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
    Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loci of signal probability effects and of the attentional blink bottleneck.
    Crebolder JM; Jolicoeur P; McIlwaine JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):695-716. PubMed ID: 12075897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.