These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17563226)

  • 21. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The psychological refractory period of stopping.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):965-81. PubMed ID: 14585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW; Capaldi EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):943-74. PubMed ID: 20822210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Action-based and vision-based selection of input: two sources of control.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):247-59. PubMed ID: 12466923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence for effects of phonological correspondence between visible speech and written syllables.
    Kerzel D
    Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12192448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Traditional response interference effects from anticipated action outcomes: a response-effect compatibility paradigm.
    Hubbard J; Gazzaley A; Morsella E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 21658661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).
    Wu C; Liu Y
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):913-54. PubMed ID: 18954209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hierarchical knowledge influences stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Tlauka M; McKenna FP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):85-103. PubMed ID: 10718065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.
    Howes A; Lewis RL; Vera A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):717-51. PubMed ID: 19839682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interhemispheric sharing of signals and responses and the psychological refractory period.
    Guiard Y; Requin J
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 854161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).
    Lien MC; Proctor RW; Ruthroff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 14640843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance.
    Janczyk M; Pfister R; Hommel B; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 24747873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Reynolds A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1126-42. PubMed ID: 14640834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices?
    Pashler H; Harris CR; Nuechterlein KH
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 25116298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Why practice reduces dual-task interference.
    Ruthruff E; Johnston JC; Van Selst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Feb; 27(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 11248938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.