These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17563229)

  • 1. Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects?
    Ellis R; Tucker M; Symes E; Vainio L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):670-91. PubMed ID: 17563229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
    Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision and power grip priming by observed grasping.
    Vainio L; Tucker M; Ellis R
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Nov; 65(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 17766020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):605-23. PubMed ID: 18505327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the interaction between perceptual and response selection: neuropsychological evidence.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Neurocase; 2003 Jun; 9(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 12925930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection and inhibition in infancy: evidence from the spatial negative priming paradigm.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Cognition; 2005 Mar; 95(2):B27-36. PubMed ID: 15694643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects.
    Vainio L; Symes E; Ellis R; Tucker M; Ottoboni G
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):444-65. PubMed ID: 18452910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return to an occluded object depends on expectation.
    Jefferies LN; Wright RD; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1224-33. PubMed ID: 16366785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An attentional mechanism for selecting appropriate actions afforded by graspable objects.
    Loach D; Frischen A; Bruce N; Tsotsos JK
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1253-7. PubMed ID: 19121133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping.
    Lindemann O; Abolafia JM; Girardi G; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1400-9. PubMed ID: 18085952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of object similarity in the production and identification of actions associated with objects.
    Desmarais G; Pensa MC; Dixon MJ; Roy EA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Nov; 13(6):1021-34. PubMed ID: 17942020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped.
    Green C; Hummel JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1107-19. PubMed ID: 17002525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18155179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An electrophysiological assessment of distractor suppression in visual search tasks.
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Caramazza A
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 19490518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting.
    Li Y; Randerath J; Bauer H; Marquardt C; Goldenberg G; Hermsdörfer J
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 196(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 18722479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual objects can potentiate a grasping neural simulation which interferes with manual response execution.
    Olivier G; Velay JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 19124117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: the generalization of response compatibility interference.
    Wiediger MD; Fournier LR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1136-49. PubMed ID: 18823201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.