These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17563489)
1. Energy dependence of dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor for low-let radiations: potential importance to estimation of cancer risks and relationship to biological effectiveness. Trabalka JR; Kocher DC Health Phys; 2007 Jul; 93(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 17563489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations. Hunter N; Muirhead CR J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation. Elmore E; Lao XY; Kapadia R; Redpath JL Radiat Res; 2006 Dec; 166(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 17149982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health risks of low photon energy imaging. Redpath JL Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):528-33. PubMed ID: 17261539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose-effect relationships, epidemiological analysis and the derivation of low dose risk. Leenhouts HP; Chadwick KH J Radiol Prot; 2011 Mar; 31(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 21346287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are all photon radiations similar in large absorbers?--a comparison of electron spectra. Kellerer AM; Roos H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15695239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does fractionation decrease the risk of breast cancer induced by low-LET radiation? Brenner DJ Radiat Res; 1999 Feb; 151(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 9952308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose rate dependence of the relative biological effectiveness of 103Pd for continuous low dose rate irradiation of BA1112 rhabdomyosarcoma cells in vitro relative to acute exposures. Nath R; Bongiorni P; Chen Z; Gragnano J; Rockwell S Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 Sep; 81(9):689-99. PubMed ID: 16368647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why it is advisable to keep wR = 1 and Q = 1 for photons and electrons. Dietze G; Alberts WG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 15273347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model. Scott BR Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The RBE of low-LET radiations. Chadwick KH; Leenhouts HP J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):445-47; author reply 447-9. PubMed ID: 19696460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures. Preston RJ Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation. Schöllnberger H; Scott BR; Hanson TE Bull Math Biol; 2001 Sep; 63(5):865-83. PubMed ID: 11565407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the clinically relevant relative biologic effectiveness? A warning for fractionated treatments with high linear energy transfer radiation. Daşu A; Toma-Daşu I Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(3):867-74. PubMed ID: 17889448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiogenic cell transformation and carcinogenesis. Yang TC; Georgy KA; Mei M; Durante M; Craise LM ASGSB Bull; 1995 Oct; 8(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 11538546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RBE of radiations in space and the implications for space travel. Edwards AA Phys Med; 2001; 17 Suppl 1():147-52. PubMed ID: 11771542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modelling carcinogenesis after radiotherapy using Poisson statistics: implications for IMRT, protons and ions. Jones B J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A143-57. PubMed ID: 19454805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A composite microdose Adaptive Response (AR) and Bystander Effect (BE) model-application to low LET and high LET AR and BE data. Leonard BE Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Aug; 84(8):681-701. PubMed ID: 18661382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-dose radiation epidemiology studies: status and issues. Shore RE Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 19820457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]