112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17563960)
1. Quality v. equality: the divided court in Chaoulli v. Quebec.
Yeo M; Lucock C
Health Law J; 2006; 14():129-50. PubMed ID: 17563960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Chaoulli case: one-tier medicine goes on trial in Quebec.
Pinker S
CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(10):1305-6. PubMed ID: 10584098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Chaoulli decision: a debate in which physicians must be heard.
Ouellet R
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):896. PubMed ID: 16217113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Private health insurance: an international overview and considerations for Canada.
Dhalla I
Healthc Q; 2007; 10(4):89-96. PubMed ID: 18274001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Chaoulli Case: a two-tier Magna Carta?
Marchildon GP
Healthc Q; 2005; 8(4):49-52, 2. PubMed ID: 16323514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court strikes ban on private health insurance.
Eggertson L
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):139. PubMed ID: 15947235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care rights in Canada: the Chaoulli legacy.
Flood CM; Xavier S
Med Law; 2008 Sep; 27(3):617-44. PubMed ID: 19004386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Public health care challenged in BC court.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E333-E334. PubMed ID: 27620633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Due process--right to medical access--Supreme Court of Canada holds that ban on private health insurance violates Quebec charter of human rights and freedoms--Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 S.C.C. 35, 29272, [2005] S.C.J. No. 33 QUICKLAW (June 9, 2005).
Harv Law Rev; 2005 Dec; 119(2):677-84. PubMed ID: 16489720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Canadian Supreme Court upholds right to take out private health insurance.
Spurgeon D
BMJ; 2005 Jun; 330(7505):1408. PubMed ID: 15961806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Health insurance - private or legally mandated? Choosing a suitable insurance group].
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 Sep; 45(5):361-2. PubMed ID: 25275690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Chaoulli decision resonates one year later.
Kondro W
CMAJ; 2006 Jul; 175(1):17. PubMed ID: 16818893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The responsibilities of the private health insurance company doctor - a balancing act].
Ostendorf GM
Versicherungsmedizin; 2014 Jun; 66(2):65. PubMed ID: 25000625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [A dual system cannot survive forever].
Baas J
MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Oct; 156(17):16. PubMed ID: 25417455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare challenge heads to trial.
Vogel L
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E331-E332. PubMed ID: 27601607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The government responds to the Chaoulli/Zeliotis judgment, easing open the door to privatization.
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(5 Suppl):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16776035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Private health insurance systems, constitution and the right to receive an equitable health care].
Zúñiga F A
Rev Med Chil; 2013 Apr; 141(4):514-8. PubMed ID: 23900373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intervenors decry Charter challenge of medicare.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(15):E371. PubMed ID: 27647612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. BC refutes Charter challenge of medicare.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(15):E369-E370. PubMed ID: 27647614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Tensions in private health insurance regulation.
Willcox S
J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):325-38. PubMed ID: 12650003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
