These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17564204)

  • 21. Orientation-specific learning of the prior assumption for 3D slant perception.
    Taya S; Sato M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11063. PubMed ID: 30038249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relative size disparities and the perception of surface slant.
    Kaneko H; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(13):1919-30. PubMed ID: 8759431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference.
    van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
    Perception; 1995; 24(3):299-314. PubMed ID: 7617431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3D surface orientation based on a novel representation of the orientation disparity field.
    Fantoni C
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2509-22. PubMed ID: 18796310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stereoscopic Depth Contrast in a 3D Müller-Lyer Configuration: Evidence for Local Normalization.
    Harada S; Mitsudo H
    Perception; 2017 Jul; 46(7):860-873. PubMed ID: 28073303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Slant or occlusion: global factors resolve stereoscopic ambiguity in sets of horizontal lines.
    Gillam B; Grove PM
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2359-66. PubMed ID: 15246752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently.
    Knapen T; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3381-92. PubMed ID: 16698056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Processing vertical size disparities in distinct depth planes.
    Duke PA; Howard IP
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):10. PubMed ID: 22904355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pre-attentive detection of a target defined by stereoscopic slant.
    Holliday IE; Braddick OJ
    Perception; 1991; 20(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 1762877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surface interpolation and 3D relatability.
    Fantoni C; Hilger JD; Gerbino W; Kellman PJ
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(7):29.1-19. PubMed ID: 19146261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stereoscopic Slant Contrast and the Perception of Inducer Slant at Brief Stimulus Presentations.
    Harada S; Mitsudo H
    Perception; 2018 Feb; 47(2):171-184. PubMed ID: 29117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stereo and motion disparities interfere with positional averaging.
    Harris JM; Morgan MJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 8447103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phantom surface captures stereopsis.
    Häkkinen J; Nyman G
    Vision Res; 2001 Jan; 41(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 11163853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The stereoscopic anisotropy affects manual pointing.
    Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; van der Willigen R; Watt SJ; Simpson PJ
    Spat Vis; 2002; 15(4):443-58. PubMed ID: 12434823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orientation disparity, deformation, and stereoscopic slant perception.
    Gillam B; Rogers B
    Perception; 1991; 20(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 1771129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A polar coordinate system for describing binocular disparity.
    Liu L; Stevenson SB; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(9):1205-22. PubMed ID: 8184564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 3D after-effects are due to shape and not disparity adaptation.
    Domini F; Adams W; Banks MS
    Vision Res; 2001 Sep; 41(21):2733-9. PubMed ID: 11587723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of large scanning eye movements on stereoscopic slant estimation of large surfaces.
    van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(3):467-79. PubMed ID: 10341977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual mechanisms underlying amodal surface integration of 3-D stereoscopic stimuli.
    He ZJ; Ooi TL; Su YR
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():66-81. PubMed ID: 29248730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours.
    Gillam B; Blackburn S; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 10341979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.