These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17565680)

  • 21. Understanding sample size: what determines the required number of microarrays for an experiment?
    Jørstad TS; Langaas M; Bones AM
    Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Feb; 12(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 17229587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design and evaluation of Actichip, a thematic microarray for the study of the actin cytoskeleton.
    Muller J; Mehlen A; Vetter G; Yatskou M; Muller A; Chalmel F; Poch O; Friederich E; Vallar L
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Aug; 8():294. PubMed ID: 17727702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experimental design of DNA microarray experiments.
    Simon RM; Dobbin K
    Biotechniques; 2003 Mar; Suppl():16-21. PubMed ID: 12664680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Purity for clarity: the need for purification of tumor cells in DNA microarray studies.
    de Ridder D; van der Linden CE; Schonewille T; Dik WA; Reinders MJ; van Dongen JJ; Staal FJ
    Leukemia; 2005 Apr; 19(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 15744349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
    Wang M; Chen JY
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Zebrafish spotted-microarray for genome-wide expression profiling experiments. Part I: array printing and hybridization.
    Lam SH; Mathavan S; Gong Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 546():175-95. PubMed ID: 19378105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Positional artifacts in microarrays: experimental verification and construction of COP, an automated detection tool.
    Yu H; Nguyen K; Royce T; Qian J; Nelson K; Snyder M; Gerstein M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007; 35(2):e8. PubMed ID: 17158151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The intraclass correlation coefficient applied for evaluation of data correction, labeling methods, and rectal biopsy sampling in DNA microarray experiments.
    Pellis L; Franssen-van Hal NL; Burema J; Keijer J
    Physiol Genomics; 2003 Dec; 16(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 14570982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling nonlinearity in dilution design microarray data.
    Zheng X; Huang HC; Li W; Liu P; Li QZ; Liu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(11):1339-47. PubMed ID: 17237040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.
    Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistically designing microarrays and microarray experiments to enhance sensitivity and specificity.
    Hsu JC; Chang J; Wang T; Steingrímsson E; Magnússon MK; Bergsteinsdottir K
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Jan; 8(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16899493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments.
    Dobbin KK; Kawasaki ES; Petersen DW; Simon RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2430-7. PubMed ID: 15774555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correcting positional correlations in Affymetrix® genome chips.
    Homouz D; Chen G; Kudlicki AS
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():9078. PubMed ID: 25767049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microarray-based genotyping of Salmonella: inter-laboratory evaluation of reproducibility and standardization potential.
    Grønlund H; Riber L; Vigre H; Löfström C; Folling L; Huehn S; Malorny B; Rådström P; Rudi K; Hoorfar J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 145 Suppl 1():S79-85. PubMed ID: 20817296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic spatial bias in DNA microarray hybridization is caused by probe spot position-dependent variability in lateral diffusion.
    Steger D; Berry D; Haider S; Horn M; Wagner M; Stocker R; Loy A
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23727. PubMed ID: 21858215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing sources of variability in microarray gene expression data.
    Spruill SE; Lu J; Hardy S; Weir B
    Biotechniques; 2002 Oct; 33(4):916-20, 922-3. PubMed ID: 12398201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detection and normalization of biases present in spotted cDNA microarray data: a composite method addressing dye, intensity-dependent, spatially-dependent, and print-order biases.
    Uchida S; Nishida Y; Satou K; Muta S; Tashiro K; Kuhara S
    DNA Res; 2005 Feb; 12(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16106748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.